UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

ecNate wrote:Deck 2051 renamed for clarity for being deleted and also deleted. Deck 790 remains and has aka name listed as well.

ecNate wrote: I THINK what you saw may be a temporary browser issue, especially if there is a non-standard sized deck displayed depending on the current layout the app will leave a blank spot to format things. So you're right there's a display bug, but it seems to be gone now for you and also I'm pretty sure is not related to deleted decks, at least not a uniform/consistent issue.

4.of.Clubs wrote:Can someone with Delete rights do this please?

Duplicate: http://www.portfolio52.com/node/269784" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. (delete this one)
Existing: http://www.portfolio52.com/node/269785" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

ecNate wrote:All duplicates cleaned up - removed the ones with the least amount of collection use. Thanks for the reporting.

I really wish people would be more careful and search before adding. The sad thing is the new system doesn't readily report who is adding so tracking down those using bad practices to help them is much more difficult.

IAmTheChin wrote:Hi Guys,

One of the big things from the previous platform was eager participation from others who weren't with Contributor or Admin level. The new site was made to allow everyone to contribute. On the back end for Contributors and Admin they have access to a list of every deck being added by who and when. It's essentially a queue list. It worked really well for a while so much so that I thought the site was able to run itself. I took the training wheels off a bit too early. Right now an added deck is IMMEDIATE but the list is still created meaning if it is spam it will show up on the list and on that list we can see any spam/duplicates and delete them.

Unfortunately it either looks like it's not working or myself as an admin am accidentally allowing decks to go through that are duplicates. In terms of immediate action I'll be adding a "duplicate" flag button. But in terms of the larger question,
"Do we want new decks to only be added by Contributors or by Everybody?"

Let me know. The solution could literally be to go back to just Contributor-level access to upload decks. But realistically speaking I'm thinking that our current system works and we just need more hands on deck that could monitor duplicates. So with that being said, if you're interested please let me know! E-mail alex@seasonsplayingcards.com and I'll try to teach any volunteers the ropes of the backend. Also eventually you'll probably get super duper profiles and free decks from me lol.

Again thank you for understanding this growing process.

-Alex

Azid wrote:Cherry Casino V2/Black:
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/3963/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/4383/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.


+ All 3 decks should be renamed to "Cherry Casino" as it is written on the side of the tuck box
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/2713/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/3253/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/3963/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

4.of.Clubs wrote: http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/4536/view
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/4445/view

Duplicates.

ecNate wrote:All duplicates now cleaned up, with the exception of the Cherry and DMC since that needs more review before I can clean up.

4.of.Clubs wrote:http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/4536/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.portfolio52.com/deck/4445/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.....

Duplicates.

5 versions - http://www.kardify.com/2016/12/first-lo ... cards.html

flyers3003 wrote:I wanted to make sure I'm not wrong before calling out a duplicate, but aren't these two the same deck?:

https://www.portfolio52.com/deck/248/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.portfolio52.com/deck/5503/view" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I realize the pictures look a little different, but that's because of the way the foiling photographs vs. scans, but I'm pretty sure its the same deck (both have the release year of 2013).