Got an email about this, looks pretty good. USPC printed, custom courts, elegant yet simple backs. Coming to Kickstarter on Feb 1, wouldn't be surprised to see other colors/versions in the future since it says Mint Collection on his website. Also features marked backs.
vasta41 wrote:According to back tuck design these cards will be one way. Boo!
Technically, all marked decks are one way, since each back is different. You can argue that they look the same upside-down, but in this case, it really doesn't matter.
>Mike<"You can't please everyone, so you've got to please yourself" They say "Ignorance is bliss". Obviously, some people are much happier than others...
Members are encouraged to Show Us Your Cards! ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ Our UC2021 Decks entitled "Odd Fellows" by Lorenzo Gaggiotti / @Stockholm17
Coming soon: AKA
«Eighth Annual Decks» ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ UC members help maintain Portfolio52
THE Playing Card Database Online
Contact ecNate for details and access ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ UC2019 "Seventh Annual Decks"
by Montenzi Design
Funded 207% on KS: HERE ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦
>>> UC Deck Sales <<< Insert disclaimer here...
All information posted as fact is accurate at the time of posting to the best of my knowledge.
I think he just means the image on the tuck back is clearly a one way registration with the design not centered left to right. But that doesn't appear to be the case on the card back design they show, assuming that is the final design. Hope they don't try to charge a premium on these like the other Noir products seemed to, I really like the deck, but it is looking like a $10 deck to me, but I'm speculating we will be looking at a $15 release
Jackson completely revolutionized the way I waste money...
This deck blows my mind. Just when you think everyone's had enough of minimalist decks this one raises over 100K. I personally don't get it but kudos to a great campaign!
vasta41 wrote:This deck blows my mind. Just when you think everyone's had enough of minimalist decks this one raises over 100K. I personally don't get it but kudos to a great campaign!
???
This isn't a minimalist deck.
Jackson completely revolutionized the way I waste money...
vasta41 wrote:This deck blows my mind. Just when you think everyone's had enough of minimalist decks this one raises over 100K. I personally don't get it but kudos to a great campaign!
???
This isn't a minimalist deck.
Maybe not by theme but it's pretty bare-bones. Not too much in the way of elaborate design. And I'm certainly not discrediting the artwork. I'm just saying it's minimal compared to many other recently funded decks.
vasta41 wrote:This deck blows my mind. Just when you think everyone's had enough of minimalist decks this one raises over 100K. I personally don't get it but kudos to a great campaign!
???
This isn't a minimalist deck.
Maybe not by theme but it's pretty bare-bones. Not too much in the way of elaborate design. And I'm certainly not discrediting the artwork. I'm just saying it's minimal compared to many other recently funded decks.
Definitely barebones, but minimalist is a specific design style that I don't think this fits with the mostly traditional design on this; Patterened card back, traditional courts. This isn't any less complex than any casino deck, I would say it's more so than many.
Jackson completely revolutionized the way I waste money...
Got mine, love the tuck and the back design, not thrilled with the courts in person, a little too boring, and somehow never realized through this whole campaign that the pips have a stylistic shadow on them, every single one, and I really really don't like them.
This deck went from me being confident that it would be my go to work deck to a deck I probably won't pick up again. Might re-purpose the tuck though, really love the tuck, it's one of my favorites.
Jackson completely revolutionized the way I waste money...
Justin O. wrote:Got mine, love the tuck and the back design, not thrilled with the courts in person, a little too boring, and somehow never realized through this whole campaign that the pips have a stylistic shadow on them, every single one, and I really really don't like them.
This deck went from me being confident that it would be my go to work deck to a deck I probably won't pick up again. Might re-purpose the tuck though, really love the tuck, it's one of my favorites.
Interesting. This was a deck that I had low expectations for and wound up being more than pleasantly surprised with. I agree that the Tuck and Back design are great. Also love the internal foil printing on the inside of the tuck. While the courts aren't very custom, I did like the choice of courts that they used (Arrco) and the little Mint touches added to them (the crowns, clothes etc). Maybe I didn't look hard enough at the pips to notice the shadow (I'll have to open 'em again when I get home), but I thought the pips looked decent as well. Also the marking system seemed to be not overly obvious, especially to the untrained eye. Overall I'm very pleased with these decks.
Hi, I opened and handled mine today and I have to say the quality can't really keep up with the great design. They don't handle better than a standard bicycle deck. I was expecting it at least to handle like a Bee deck after it was hyped as a high quality deck with premium stock. the traditional cut is nice though what are your thoughts on this?
Here's a video about these cards from 52Kards channel:
In my opinion this looks to be the best minimalist custom deck ever created. That box for example is just great!
Left my heart inSIERRA MADRE
"Finding it... that's not the hard part. It's letting go."
"One makes a trip by day, but by night one sets out on a journey." -Moominmamma
I dream of a world where wars are fought only by having dance offs. I also dream that a Finnish playing card designer would exist. The former seems more likely to happend.
Money can't buy you happiness, but it can buy you a penguin. Have you ever met a sad person with a penguin?
Are lobsters mermaids to scorpions?
"I did not hit her, it's not true, it's bullsh*t, I did not hit her, I did naaaht! Oh hai Mark!"