UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

Well if you never think our playing card community can make a difference, you will now find you were wrong. When USPCC produced their Distressed Back, a UC member pointed out the back they were using was not the expert back, but a fan back design. I forwarded the info to USPCC and I was told at the time, they would be correcting the back in their next printing.

I just received my new order and indeed they have corrected their mistake in the first printing. That proves a couple of things:

1) UC does make a difference

2) USPCC does listen to the playing card community.

Great job everybody!!!!!

Thanks!

Pics or it didn't happen!

The distressing is not nearly as heavy. Here is our ebay link and it will be on our website shortly:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 1118039744" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks!

It was me that mentioned it to you.

the first release had the wrong back design on it...



This is the Old Fan Back design - seen here in the Bicycle Catalog -- Back No. 57

http://www.cypressfilms.com/bicycle/57/red.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;




This is the corrected back....



As seen in the Bicycle Catalog -- Back No. 29

http://www.cypressfilms.com/bicycle/29/red.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



All the back designs can be seen here..
http://www.cypressfilms.com/bicycle/index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm glad they corrected it. I wonder how many of the decks with the error on it were printed

CBJ

I got a couple of different numbers from USPCC, so I am not sure.

Thanks!