A new look at S.W. Erdnase
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:22 am
Let us know what you think.
The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.
https://unitedcardists.com/
Thank you for the feedback. The design having 90 degree corners make thin borders look terrible ( printing uspcc) however if someone has a good stock suggestion from a company that doesn’t have the registration problems that uspcc has, I would gladly reconsider the printer.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 am Tuck looks great. Plus one for Tom; some gold metallic on the back would be some icing on the cake.
I personally would like the leaves and acorns in a more realistic, less icon/graphic design look, if you get what I mean. I would prefer it as well if the area between the center element (leaves, acorns) and the border would be thinner. More leaves and acorns instead. But that's subjective.
Definitely good job in creating a good looking vintage/classic back design.
I agree on the overwhelming number of erdnase decks. With the limited amount of information on Erdnase most designers have made a minimalist deck with the most creative being a book cover for a tuck. I thought what if we can make a classy erdnase deck that is worth of collecting. (I’m not knocking any of the designers before us). On the gold Back , where would you suggest?MagikFingerz wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:30 am Despite there having been made an overwhelming number of Erdnase decks before, this one looks pretty good. But why not incorporate some of that gold from the box on the backs as well?
I wasn't talking about the border if the card. I meant the area between the center element and the hands. This dotted or thin lined area.oddsmaker003 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:41 amThank you for the feedback. The design having 90 degree corners make thin borders look terrible ( printing uspcc) however if someone has a good stock suggestion from a company that doesn’t have the registration problems that uspcc has, I would gladly reconsider the printer.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 am Tuck looks great. Plus one for Tom; some gold metallic on the back would be some icing on the cake.
I personally would like the leaves and acorns in a more realistic, less icon/graphic design look, if you get what I mean. I would prefer it as well if the area between the center element (leaves, acorns) and the border would be thinner. More leaves and acorns instead. But that's subjective.
Definitely good job in creating a good looking vintage/classic back design.
Im aware of the various printers but not their different card stock. Being a card guy more than a collector the handling is of high importance.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:10 pmI wasn't talking about the border if the card. I meant the area between the center element and the hands. This dotted or thin lined area.oddsmaker003 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:41 amThank you for the feedback. The design having 90 degree corners make thin borders look terrible ( printing uspcc) however if someone has a good stock suggestion from a company that doesn’t have the registration problems that uspcc has, I would gladly reconsider the printer.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 am Tuck looks great. Plus one for Tom; some gold metallic on the back would be some icing on the cake.
I personally would like the leaves and acorns in a more realistic, less icon/graphic design look, if you get what I mean. I would prefer it as well if the area between the center element (leaves, acorns) and the border would be thinner. More leaves and acorns instead. But that's subjective.
Definitely good job in creating a good looking vintage/classic back design.
As for USPC alternative. Hansonchien or LPCC printed in Taiwan.
Yeah, most of the previous ones have been really boring.oddsmaker003 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:44 amI agree on the overwhelming number of erdnase decks. With the limited amount of information on Erdnase most designers have made a minimalist deck with the most creative being a book cover for a tuck. I thought what if we can make a classy erdnase deck that is worth of collecting. (I’m not knocking any of the designers before us). On the gold Back , where would you suggest?MagikFingerz wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:30 am Despite there having been made an overwhelming number of Erdnase decks before, this one looks pretty good. But why not incorporate some of that gold from the box on the backs as well?
That would be sick! Great ideaMagikFingerz wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:59 pmYeah, most of the previous ones have been really boring.oddsmaker003 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:44 amI agree on the overwhelming number of erdnase decks. With the limited amount of information on Erdnase most designers have made a minimalist deck with the most creative being a book cover for a tuck. I thought what if we can make a classy erdnase deck that is worth of collecting. (I’m not knocking any of the designers before us). On the gold Back , where would you suggest?MagikFingerz wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:30 am Despite there having been made an overwhelming number of Erdnase decks before, this one looks pretty good. But why not incorporate some of that gold from the box on the backs as well?
Hmm, maybe gild the edges of the decks in his hands, and make a few of the leaves in the middle gold (top, outer middle and bottom)?
On LPCC, can check what they used for Jody Eklund’s Kodiak. It’s the best non-USPCC deck I’ve handled so far. Snappier than USPCC, but soft enough that they can be sprung, dribbled, fanned, faroed out of the box.oddsmaker003 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:59 pmIm aware of the various printers but not their different card stock. Being a card guy more than a collector the handling is of high importance.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:10 pmI wasn't talking about the border if the card. I meant the area between the center element and the hands. This dotted or thin lined area.oddsmaker003 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:41 amThank you for the feedback. The design having 90 degree corners make thin borders look terrible ( printing uspcc) however if someone has a good stock suggestion from a company that doesn’t have the registration problems that uspcc has, I would gladly reconsider the printer.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 am Tuck looks great. Plus one for Tom; some gold metallic on the back would be some icing on the cake.
I personally would like the leaves and acorns in a more realistic, less icon/graphic design look, if you get what I mean. I would prefer it as well if the area between the center element (leaves, acorns) and the border would be thinner. More leaves and acorns instead. But that's subjective.
Definitely good job in creating a good looking vintage/classic back design.
As for USPC alternative. Hansonchien or LPCC printed in Taiwan.