UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

This is their second run as this campaign, and they did receive some advice from the UC drawing board forum of which they acknowledged in the campaign:

We would like to personally thank our friends on UNITEDCARDISTS for all their help and support and direction of this deck and helping us to improve them.

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=12402&hilit=royal+portraits" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Couldn't find any post relating to their first campaign though, or is it with a different name? Please help merge if there is.

I like the card back, but that's about it. Definitely a pass for me.

It looks familiar, for sure. Not for me.

I find it amusing that they don’t seem to have changed the copy from their first campaign: “We are very pleased to show for the first time our classic, yet realistic deck, The Royal Portraits.”

Either way, I won’t be backing. Something about the tuck just seems... cheesy? to me. Best of luck to them.

Why put all that work into the court art and then have those terrible pips with the smudges(?) through them?

I don't know like it and I wouldn't buy even if they fixed the pips, but it's just one of a few strange decisions in this that have my scratching my head.