UnitedCardists.com - The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.

Lets see if USPCC will approve the card back, AoS, and Jokers...

I kind of like it except for the custom Queen and King.

Some of the statements on this project...

The Innocence deck is characterized by it's astonishing detailed back design.

I mean, I've seen backs that are a lot more detailed, not to mention it's not much more than a single sketch duplicated 4 times.

If there is only one deck I could use for the rest of my life, I would choose this one.

Well duh, of course its creator would say that...

If you don't play with cards every day you probably won't recognize all changes on the standard looking face cards.

Two faces. That's it. And they're black and white, sans the red indices/pips.

It's the mix between extraordinary drawings and familiar looking playing card elements that makes this deck so special.

There are hundreds, if not thousands of other decks that do this.

Sorry, I had to get that off my chest. All that said, the back has potential, and the AoS is pretty cool. Plus, that rendered animation of the deck is pretty neat. But that's about it for me. I'd need it to have custom courts and go a few rounds in the Drafting Board before I backed this.

I'm sorry if this sounds a bit crude, but with the name "innocence" and the combination of the back design with the seal, am I the only weirdo that is seeing a deck of female masterbation...? Because IMHO, that's what these design choices (whether intentionally or not) seem to be alluding to....

PipChick wrote:I'm sorry if this sounds a bit crude, but with the name "innocence" and the combination of the back design with the seal, am I the only weirdo that is seeing a deck of female masterbation...? Because IMHO, that's what these design choices (whether intentionally or not) seem to be alluding to....

Well now....

I didn't see that before. And now I can't not see it.

No no no nonononononono..........

Spectre wrote:

PipChick wrote:I'm sorry if this sounds a bit crude, but with the name "innocence" and the combination of the back design with the seal, am I the only weirdo that is seeing a deck of female masterbation...? Because IMHO, that's what these design choices (whether intentionally or not) seem to be alluding to....

Well now....

I didn't see that before. And now I can't not see it.

I somehow didn't see it either.

Possibly because there wasn't a Hitachi Magic Wand involved.

My virgin eyes are bleeding. These hurt to look at because of how ugly they are.

Bradius wrote:

Spectre wrote:

PipChick wrote:I'm sorry if this sounds a bit crude, but with the name "innocence" and the combination of the back design with the seal, am I the only weirdo that is seeing a deck of female masterbation...? Because IMHO, that's what these design choices (whether intentionally or not) seem to be alluding to....

Well now....

I didn't see that before. And now I can't not see it.

No no no nonononononono..........

sorry guys if I offended anyone's puritan sensibilities lol - I feel kinda guilty for even bringing up such a touchy subject (especially if it ruined how anyone sees this deck - or can't unsee it either lol)

The design is not for me, but I suppose this deck could come in handy if one's playing bridge - you'd never need a good partner because you can always rely on yourself to have a good hand...

Merlebird wrote:I somehow didn't see it either.

Possibly because there wasn't a Hitachi Magic Wand involved.

with that said, this would most certainly not be necessary - besides, the design would just get outta hand if it was included

TwoPieceFeed wrote:My virgin eyes are bleeding. These hurt to look at because of how ugly they are.

and TwoPiece; comm'on, just get ahold of yourself and relax lmao

A beautiful deck with this imagery, this thematic material, is possible. I’d back that deck. This just isn’t it.

I'm putting my pledge in

PipChick wrote:I'm sorry if this sounds a bit crude, but with the name "innocence" and the combination of the back design with the seal, am I the only weirdo that is seeing a deck of female masterbation...? Because IMHO, that's what these design choices (whether intentionally or not) seem to be alluding to....

Yeah, frankly, my mind "went there" as soon as I saw the images, and I'm like... um... "innocence?" You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

So, yeah. I may be a little loose with how I spend my hard... cash, but I won't be splurging for this deck.

How the %^&* is this close to funding?

Sunish has to relaunch Bharata V2, without gilding, but this has $4.5k?

Idiocracy at its finest.

TwoPieceFeed wrote:How the %^&* is this close to funding?

Sunish has to relaunch Bharata V2, without gilding, but this has $4.5k?

Idiocracy at its finest.

Really rubbing it in 2pf.

RichK wrote:

TwoPieceFeed wrote:Sunish has to relaunch Bharata V2, without gilding, but this has $4.5k?

Idiocracy at its finest.

Really rubbing it in 2pf.

I see what you did there.

Who is backing this %^&* show?

REVEAL YOURSELVES AND PREPARE FOR CRITICISM!

I'm considering giving the creator $6k to NOT print this.

TwoPieceFeed wrote:How the %^&* is this close to funding?

Sunish has to relaunch Bharata V2, without gilding, but this has $4.5k?

Idiocracy at its finest.

I'm seriously incapable of handling this right now - it's completely incomprehensible!

TwoPieceFeed wrote:I'm considering giving the creator $6k to NOT print this.

hand it over to Sunish instead so ffs we can get gilding on our Bharatas lol

Well, if this gets approved by USPCC after the grief they gave another creator for flipping the bird, I will......I don’t know. Frustrated I guess. Yeah this is a deck I would actually pay not to see the light of day. Why anyone would back it is beyond me as well.

Bradius wrote:WWhy anyone would back it is beyond me as well.

I only backed it for the humorous content in this thread.

Grrrr.....go......whatever.....$#%^*~¥¥!

TwoPieceFeed wrote:I'm considering giving the creator $6k to NOT print this.

Give me $6K and I promise I won't print this.

Merlebird wrote:

TwoPieceFeed wrote:I'm considering giving the creator $6k to NOT print this.

Give me $6K and I promise I won't print this.

TwoPieceFeed wrote:How the %^&* is this close to funding?

Sunish has to relaunch Bharata V2, without gilding, but this has $4.5k?

Idiocracy at its finest.

Different strokes for different folks

tmbdp2001 wrote:Different strokes for different folks

LMAO

tmbdp2001 wrote:

TwoPieceFeed wrote:How the %^&* is this close to funding?

Sunish has to relaunch Bharata V2, without gilding, but this has $4.5k?

Idiocracy at its finest.

Different strokes for different folks