Page 1 of 1
Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:34 am
by willroya
I am working on a new deck with artist Sasha Dounaevski. I would really like your opinion on what back coloring (if any) you like best. Other cards are attached for reference / preview. Thanks!
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:43 am
by vedus
I find the back design very noisy. It's not as clean as the illustrations.
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:45 am
by guru
Hi Will,
This deck's campaign is still running on Indiegogo showing 18 days left for the campaign to end. Since you're supporting it now, I hope it will fair better with a relaunch on Kickstarter. The cards really look nice but there is no bells & whistles like tuck foiling, embossing etc. You may want to ask her to cancel the campaign on Indiegogo and relaunch through your assistance on Kickstarter and I can't see why it won't get funded then.
Regards,
Sunish
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:24 am
by JuFiN
love the deck! I really hope you find a way to get it on Kickstarter where I am confident it will fund. As for back design I like #3 but maybe a few more things highlighted in red to match the faces of the cards. (Some of the elements that are blue in design #4)
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:55 am
by Räpylätassu
Number 4 is the best back IMO. Number 3 is also pretty good.
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:20 am
by sashado
guru wrote:Hi Will,
This deck's campaign is still running on Indiegogo showing 18 days left for the campaign to end. Since you're supporting it now, I hope it will fair better with a relaunch on Kickstarter. The cards really look nice but there is no bells & whistles like tuck foiling, embossing etc. You may want to ask her to cancel the campaign on Indiegogo and relaunch through your assistance on Kickstarter and I can't see why it won't get funded then.
Regards,
Sunish
Hi, it is cancelled already - Indiegogo has not real option to cancel, so I just have hide all perks and refunded all backers.
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:33 am
by RichK
Räpylätassu wrote:Number 4 is the best back IMO. Number 3 is also pretty good.
+1
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:43 am
by maxs
Räpylätassu wrote:Number 4 is the best back IMO. Number 3 is also pretty good.
+1
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:24 pm
by willroya
Thank you all for the feedback so far, a KS campaign is planned, but we are going to be getting a prototype deck printed for proofing and pre-review first. If you or someone you know who has reviewed pre-release decks before please feel free to contact me directly. Thanks!
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:55 am
by shermjack
Very excited that you have joined forces with Sasha, Will!
For the card backs, I honestly would like to see more options as I think there is still to much white space (except of course the blue back with white outline). Look forward to the re-launch on KS either way as I love the art!
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:03 am
by Mike Ratledge
willroya wrote:Thank you all for the feedback so far, a KS campaign is planned, but we are going to be getting a prototype deck printed for proofing and pre-review first. If you or someone you know who has reviewed pre-release decks before please feel free to contact me directly. Thanks!
I'd be happy to take a peek and see what I can find / help you with, Will.
Shipping address is same as "Friend of UC":
Mike Ratledge
995 Buck Hall Landing Rd
McClellanville SC 29458-9308 (USA)
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:59 pm
by NineLives
Looking forward to the KS launch - this deck definitely deserves to be printed
For the backs I like 3 and 4 - which one do you like the most Sasha?
Good luck with the next phase on your Wonderland journey
Re: Alice in Wonderland
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:15 am
by willroya
Project is now live.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pl ... s-free-usa" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thanks again for the input.