Re: Thirdway Industries Odissea - LIVE on KS
Posted: Thu May 17, 2018 10:54 pm
Gio, you know I'm a fan. I'm just ready to see something new.
The forum for Cardistry, Magic, Custom Decks and All Things Playing Cards.
https://unitedcardists.com/
Not complaining, just experiencing style fatigue. If I didn't love Gio's style then I wouldn't own every other one of his decks. But for the first time ever I'm sitting on the sideline with this one. If he released Odissea 2 years ago I would be in for all 3 decks easily. But at this point in time it's just not different enough for me to bear the financial commitment. Congrats on the success though, Gio! I'm eagerly awaiting your next project.Räpylätassu wrote:I love this deck, like everything Giovanni does.
Complaining about his style getting boring is like complaining that your favorite sports team has won the championship 5 times in a row with the almost the same roster everytime.
I agree with vasta41 here. Giovanni is a great designer and puts a lot of thought in every single deck he does, and for that he has my most sincere appreciation, don't know anyother designer that ties his decks so well.vasta41 wrote: Not complaining, just experiencing style fatigue. If I didn't love Gio's style then I wouldn't own every other one of his decks. But for the first time ever I'm sitting on the sideline with this one. If he released Odissea 2 years ago I would be in for all 3 decks easily. But at this point in time it's just not different enough for me to bear the financial commitment. Congrats on the success though, Gio! I'm eagerly awaiting your next project.
I would like to comment on this argument, not as a Giovanni's friend, but as a fellow project creator. Being consistent with the style is a good thing, because you create a trend, a company image that "sells".. Actually I have the opposite problem: since I work with many different illustrators, the style is not the same, and that's confusing for a small new company like Passione. Love is a Smoke, Teliad, Inferno and the unfortunate Pizza are all different. I bet that if Passione launched "Purgatorio", the next in the Inferno series, things would have been different.vasta41 wrote:With past decks Gio has been criticized for having a monotonous style. I always ignored that talk because the decks were great and different enough for me. But I think this might be my tipping point. It's not that this deck isn't beautiful (sealed or opened, with or without borders although I almost always prefer borders) but with increasing playing card prices I might have to pass on these decks because they just seem superfluous. I know they're different like all the rest but also retain Gio's noticeable style (which isn't a bad thing!) F.or me I think it's a combination of cost vs. "style fatigue" but as usual, I will keep an eye on these and I might change my mind. Either way I hope and know this will fund, with or without my support!
I agree with everything you said except for the fact that this is an argument. I am not trying to argue, it's just my personal opinion.Conturbia wrote:I would like to comment on this argument, not as a Giovanni's friend, but as a fellow project creator. Being consistent with the style is a good thing, because you create a trend, a company image that "sells".. Actually I have the opposite problem: since I work with many different illustrators, the style is not the same, and that's confusing for a small new company like Passione. Love is a Smoke, Teliad, Inferno and the unfortunate Pizza are all different. I bet that if Passione launched "Purgatorio", the next in the Inferno series, things would have been different.vasta41 wrote:With past decks Gio has been criticized for having a monotonous style. I always ignored that talk because the decks were great and different enough for me. But I think this might be my tipping point. It's not that this deck isn't beautiful (sealed or opened, with or without borders although I almost always prefer borders) but with increasing playing card prices I might have to pass on these decks because they just seem superfluous. I know they're different like all the rest but also retain Gio's noticeable style (which isn't a bad thing!) F.or me I think it's a combination of cost vs. "style fatigue" but as usual, I will keep an eye on these and I might change my mind. Either way I hope and know this will fund, with or without my support!
Oh and BTW, Vivaldi, Pinocchio and Liberty, our next projects, are all different.
The market speaks and says that Giovanni is right, it would not be wise to ignore that.
Oh that's my fault . "Argument" is a false friend word for us, we often make a mistake and use it as a synonimus of "conversation" it has no negative meaning in Italian lanugagevasta41 wrote:I agree with everything you said except for the fact that this is an argument. I am not trying to argue, it's just my personal opinion.Conturbia wrote:I would like to comment on this argument, not as a Giovanni's friend, but as a fellow project creator. Being consistent with the style is a good thing, because you create a trend, a company image that "sells".. Actually I have the opposite problem: since I work with many different illustrators, the style is not the same, and that's confusing for a small new company like Passione. Love is a Smoke, Teliad, Inferno and the unfortunate Pizza are all different. I bet that if Passione launched "Purgatorio", the next in the Inferno series, things would have been different.vasta41 wrote:With past decks Gio has been criticized for having a monotonous style. I always ignored that talk because the decks were great and different enough for me. But I think this might be my tipping point. It's not that this deck isn't beautiful (sealed or opened, with or without borders although I almost always prefer borders) but with increasing playing card prices I might have to pass on these decks because they just seem superfluous. I know they're different like all the rest but also retain Gio's noticeable style (which isn't a bad thing!) F.or me I think it's a combination of cost vs. "style fatigue" but as usual, I will keep an eye on these and I might change my mind. Either way I hope and know this will fund, with or without my support!
Oh and BTW, Vivaldi, Pinocchio and Liberty, our next projects, are all different.
The market speaks and says that Giovanni is right, it would not be wise to ignore that.
I think it'd be cool to see a Gio deck gilded in a non-traditional color. The Open Portals campaign, for example, is offering decks with cherry-red metallic gilding. That kind of bright, colorful pop would really pair well with Gio's more vibrant art, in my opinion.TwoPiece wrote:I just don't think that gilding would fit your decks. Especially since your style typically goes well with full-color backs. Gilding usually works better on decks that have a white border (a good contrast).
or maybe consider some neon edges like as seen on this deck - you don't see that very often and it would def fit the aesthetic of you bright neon-colored designsThirdway Industries wrote:@TwoPiece @Merlebird
Actually, I am curious about gilding - I was not very interested in the past, but lately I think it's one of the main features of decks I have never used, and I feel I'm missing something
I haven't decided yet if and when do that, but maybe I could try to gild some decks for "test". Let's see...
Anyways, thank you for the feedback, always useful
Actually, many others in the past have gilded their decks in non-traditional colors (which I assume are gold, silver and copper like the Uusi decks), such as Gamblers, Alex Chin, Steve Minty and CPC, who have done various colored gilded decks, including blue, green, purple, red and even prismatic colors. Nevertheless, it is something that Gio hasn't done yet and I agree that it should be done!Merlebird wrote:I think it'd be cool to see a Gio deck gilded in a non-traditional color. The Open Portals campaign, for example, is offering decks with cherry-red metallic gilding. That kind of bright, colorful pop would really pair well with Gio's more vibrant art, in my opinion.TwoPiece wrote:I just don't think that gilding would fit your decks. Especially since your style typically goes well with full-color backs. Gilding usually works better on decks that have a white border (a good contrast).
EXACTLY! those would be the decks I'd first test it out oncaniveski wrote:I like Pipchicks idea, some kind of neon gilding on the delirium/lunatica would look cool
portcullis wrote:I'd be up for a gilded deck.
I'm still laughing that even after all your ranting, you still backed the deck. I would like to see a different theme, still don't mind the artwork, but a new theme would be fantastic.portcullis wrote:Full disclosure: the limited deck and the EB price was enough to get me in. Had it stayed as a pair it would have been an easy pass.
I just wanted to add further to my comments yesterday, because I was discussing this set with a fellow collector who actually put me onto Gio's work and I blundered into my critique of Gio's work. I appreciate the amount of work Gio puts into every single card he produces, and his decks are becoming increasingly intricate and there has been a significant progression in terms of technique but there's really been no evolution in terms of the art style since Dedalo. But that's one opinion emerging from the garble.
My other gripe is that, to put it plainly, I'm ready to see something really different from Gio. As great as these classical mythology-inspired decks have been, you don't go to Subway solely for a ham, cheese and tomato toastie. I had the same complaint of Natalia Silva a while back and she pulled Avalon out of nowhere after several variations upon the Dia Los Muertos theme. I know it's been done before by others, but I'd really like to see Gio's take on a high medieval-themed deck: Joan of Arc or the Bayeux [Tapestry] Embroidery or even something Angevin. Heck if it was able to be done I'd even take a Shakespearean-themed deck from Gio. None of those suggestions, however, should be in his signature art style.