Page 15 of 22
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Thu May 02, 2019 3:42 pm
by Bradius
My blue silk de ls just arrived, so those in the US should be getting them any day, if not already. Thanks Lotrek.
I am not sure which version I prefer. I like them both!
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 6:13 am
by theCapraAegagrus
The red is better.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 6:35 am
by Merlebird
TwoPiece wrote:The red is better.
You are entitled to - and I wholeheartedly respect - your very stupid opinion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d63e/8d63eae00b212a232f964a9918ed29f42435dc25" alt="Ugly Think :ugthink:"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 7:54 am
by Magic Tapp
TwoPiece wrote:The red is better.
I am still waiting for the blue decks to arrive (they are a couple of days out) but based on the photos, I think I would like the red one better. I really like the black and gold tuck.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 8:45 am
by theCapraAegagrus
Merlebird wrote:TwoPiece wrote:The red is better.
You are entitled to - and I wholeheartedly respect - your very correct opinion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d63e/8d63eae00b212a232f964a9918ed29f42435dc25" alt="Ugly Think :ugthink:"
Fixed.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 10:12 am
by Decknowledgy
Just had a quick feel of both decks, the handling is nice with this set and the blue one seems to handle even better of the two. One feedback though is the tongue flap that's so hard to open, literally had to use a letter opener to pry it open between the little gaps from the side in order not to bend the tuck.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 4:19 pm
by shkorc
Received the blue deck today. Was with my five year old son when I opened the deck. We were both picking our jaws from the floor. Note that he's in kindergarten, no formal education about art, not much experience with playing cards, but he knew these were special.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 9:53 pm
by Thedissident001
Decknowledgy wrote:Just had a quick feel of both decks, the handling is nice with this set and the blue one seems to handle even better of the two. One feedback though is the tongue flap that's so hard to open, literally had to use a letter opener to pry it open between the little gaps from the side in order not to bend the tuck.
You used a letter opener on a Lotrek deck!?!? Jesus H Christ man, have you no fear?
Seriously though, the tuck was particularly tight on this and I had similar issues. I found tapping the top and bottom of the tuck loosened the cards inside enough to open the tongue flap. Also, putting the cards back inside without snagging on the interior flaps was tricky. I taught myself a new method of putting the front and back cards in at the depth they needed first and then sliding the rest of the cards in between them.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 2:18 am
by Magic Tapp
Decknowledgy wrote:Just had a quick feel of both decks, the handling is nice with this set and the blue one seems to handle even better of the two. One feedback though is the tongue flap that's so hard to open, literally had to use a letter opener to pry it open between the little gaps from the side in order not to bend the tuck.
Yep, the deck is packed very tight and that is one of the reason the flap is so difficult to open. As for your method of opening the deck, after nearly bending a couple of decks, that is how I open most of my decks. I have a very thin and narrow blade and it makes opening flaps much easier.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 6:02 am
by Decknowledgy
Thedissident001 wrote:You used a letter opener on a Lotrek deck!?!? Jesus H Christ man, have you no fear?
You should fear me even more as I've touched the cards with my bare hands and fanned them in my palms several times
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 1:17 pm
by Bikefanatic
Opening both of my DeNovo decks were worse than opening the blue Silk deck, I got them on the same day.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 2:22 pm
by Lotrek
I was away with very bad internet connection so I didn't login here. I'm very happy you're very happy with both editions!
1) Regarding the different back and tuck for the Blue Silk: It's not because some people complained about the two colors of Damask. These complaints were justified because I had said that the Damask would be the only edition and I didn't resist the temptation to do it in blue. With Silk I could simply had said that I will do two colors and everything would be fine.
I just had done two completely different versions of the back and I could not decide. I liked them both! So I decided to do them both.
2) Regarding the top flap: The deck is not tight in the tuck however the flap's tongue is a bit wide in order to remain tightly closed without those cuts that the tuck case flaps usually have and pop up like owl ears.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19fc3/19fc39dcfabf2a7d2aeda6aaf1cc8e8ffc60b380" alt="Smile :)"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 5:12 pm
by Merlebird
Lotrek wrote:2) Regarding the top flap: The deck is not tight in the tuck however the flap's tongue is a bit wide in order to remain tightly closed without those cuts that the tuck case flaps usually have and pop up like owl ears.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19fc3/19fc39dcfabf2a7d2aeda6aaf1cc8e8ffc60b380" alt="Smile :)"
I never thought of the side flaps as owl ears but now it's going to be impossible to unsee it.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sat May 04, 2019 6:48 pm
by Lotrek
Merlebird wrote:Lotrek wrote:2) Regarding the top flap: The deck is not tight in the tuck however the flap's tongue is a bit wide in order to remain tightly closed without those cuts that the tuck case flaps usually have and pop up like owl ears.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19fc3/19fc39dcfabf2a7d2aeda6aaf1cc8e8ffc60b380" alt="Smile :)"
I never thought of the side flaps as owl ears but now it's going to be impossible to unsee it.
I'm not talking about the side flaps...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/176b0/176b04397891c4d8ec674daee3bb7b496e21acfe" alt="owl ears.jpg"
- owl ears.jpg (288.85 KiB) Viewed 2500 times
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 2:02 pm
by Räpylätassu
On the topic of Red vs Blue Silk: I only own the blue deck but what I have seen in pictures, the Blue tuck just looks so much better. I also think the back design looks way better in the blue version.
I normally always prefer the color red over blue, but this one is the exception.
Also: holy shit this is a gorgeous deck.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 6:17 am
by theCapraAegagrus
Lotrek wrote:Merlebird wrote:Lotrek wrote:2) Regarding the top flap: The deck is not tight in the tuck however the flap's tongue is a bit wide in order to remain tightly closed without those cuts that the tuck case flaps usually have and pop up like owl ears.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19fc3/19fc39dcfabf2a7d2aeda6aaf1cc8e8ffc60b380" alt="Smile :)"
I never thought of the side flaps as owl ears but now it's going to be impossible to unsee it.
I'm not talking about the side flaps...
owl ears.jpg
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 3:10 am
by Adonael
Received the blue today, it's quite beautiful, I knew it was going to be my favourite of the two before I even saw the previews lol. If I wasn't seeing it with my own eyes I'd think foiling like this would be impossible. Here's my contribution to the attempts at photographing this deck:
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 3:58 am
by Harvonsgard
I hate y'all, I hate y'all, I hate y'all, I hate y'all, I hate y'all, I hate y'all, I hate y'all in here!
You pushed me too far with all of your pictures! I just have to see it with my own eyes - I just placed an order on a $80 deck of cards...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4ce0/b4ce0ac706444f0ff69a73094ffd2d33e6281998" alt="Ugly Dance :ugdance:"
My first Lotrek and when he finished his Bosch deck, definetly not my last one.
... next order - a pair of white cotton gloves.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 5:15 am
by Eric Lee
Welcome to the deep end of the rabbit hole that is card collecting. You know you're in this addic...hobby deep when you've purchased your 1st Lotrek with no regrets and you want more!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 6:41 am
by theCapraAegagrus
I may have to get the blue deck, because the contrast in color is just better. Red has the better design, though
Frk.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 8:07 am
by Lotrek
Great photos Adonael! Thank you!
I see they have already caused serious damage to TwoPiece...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 9:51 am
by Harvonsgard
TwoPiece wrote:I may have to get the blue deck, because the contrast in color is just better. Red has the better design, though
Frk.
I'm a bit biased because when it comes to standard back designs I always choose blue over red.
For the Silk deck; I really like the design with the birds better + the added colour on the tuck + the contrast you mentioned = 3-0 clear advantage blue variant.
TL;DR: Yah, you have to get the Blue Silk
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 1:08 pm
by vincent1018
Damm I really just paid $80 for a single deck...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 1:22 pm
by Magic Tapp
So it looks like I am going to be in minority here as I really like the red deck. That raven black tuck is magnificent.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 1:54 pm
by hsbc
Lots of people in here getting blue Silk as their first Lotrek deck - me too
*checks mailbox*
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Wed May 08, 2019 5:14 pm
by TheGentlemanWake
I just received both. Review at some point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Re:
Posted: Thu May 09, 2019 2:34 am
by Harvonsgard
Magic Tapp wrote:So it looks like I am going to be in minority here as I really like the red deck. That raven black tuck is magnificent.
I mean, we are comparing rubies and sapphires here. I don't dislike the red deck, this is still a beautiful, wonderful art piece. I personally just prefer the Blue Silk. If anyone in here is willing to gift me a Red Silk, I wouldn't be mad
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
!
Re:
Posted: Thu May 09, 2019 2:37 am
by Harvonsgard
TheGentlemanWake wrote:I just received both. Review at some point.
Now that's a video I'm looking forward to.
Short of topic: Cool review on the 6006, I liked that you weren't afraid to leave your comfort zone of decks and even had something nice to say about these kind of decks.
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Thu May 09, 2019 11:27 pm
by hsbc
Well I hope you got one if you wanted one because the Oath webstore is sold out
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51a5b/51a5b115313cecb9bdbc00b491149d952bc9b7ec" alt="Very Happy :D"
Re: "SILK" by OathPlayingCards
Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 12:56 am
by Kurama
Both are still available (74.99£) at
https://jpgamesltd.co.uk/SILK-Playing-C ... earch=Silk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
For how long?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4adb4/4adb45ceeda6fb95c8e63ead802b67580f35b25e" alt="Cool 8-)"