Page 2 of 2
Re: REN - designed by David Goldklang
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 5:24 am
by jsantafe
I am a total ignorant in magic routines, but isn't a double backer more useful than a giant Spade?
Re: REN - designed by David Goldklang
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:09 am
by sprouts1115
Actually, It was Dave that inspired me to do my deck. Here is the proof.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85536/855366be29f1672d4a5eacea175e172df0c24674" alt="Screenshot 2015-06-20 10.53.15.png"
- Screenshot 2015-06-20 10.53.15.png (262.96 KiB) Viewed 515 times
https://www.facebook.com/russelllcommon
I thought of putting the rank of the card inside the suit since 2010. After more research, I have found out it's been done time and time again even after the
Thomas De La Rue deck. It just has not stuck yet.
I do agree with MagikFingerz. You need some indices. Think of the front of the card as the unified field theorem. Mostly, the top right is reserved for quantum mechanics. You use this space to identify what the rank and suit of the card is up close. The other space on the card is the universe. That is a lot of space to draw on, but its main goal is to identify what the rank and suit of the card is at a distance.
Edit: Wow! I must have been smoking the good stuff last year. In this case, I stand behind my words...
Re: REN - designed by David Goldklang
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:50 am
by davegk
Hey folks,
It's been a while and I've been busy with other projects, but still planning to move forward with this deck.
I've been working on the tuckbox and I know it will use red and silver foils and embossing. I created a couple quick mockups of 2 designs that I'm considering and wanted to know which one you prefer...
v1:
v2:
Re: REN - designed by David Goldklang
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 9:14 am
by jerichoholic
I think my interest in this one is minimal