<3 
Measure twice, cut once. Take your time, I'm sure this will fund whenever you're ready.ehsanziaf wrote:Hello guys,
We would liked to launch the campaign very soon but we’ve got really sick and gonna postpone it till we get back on foot
Be safe and healthy <3
Get well soon! Convalesce until you’re ready; like the last poster said, this project is virtually certain to be funded regardless of its release date.ehsanziaf wrote:Hello guys,
We would liked to launch the campaign very soon but we’ve got really sick and gonna postpone it till we get back on foot
Be safe and healthy <3
Thanks for mentioning this, I never done this myself before and not so sure about dates but certainly delays might happens. I checked other live campaigns some are for June and some even goes till December. I will update ours, thanks! Better to be safe than sorryjustplaycards wrote:If this campaign isn't going to finish until the middle of April. July delivery seems a little optimistic. Looks great though, will certainly bag a few.
Maybe like Lotrek, they're having a meeting with Time as wellvasta41 wrote:These are late.
Not late because it's after 11:00, late because they posted after Lotrek. Everyone exhausted their budget on Crypt lolDecknowledgy wrote:Maybe like Lotrek, they're having a meeting with Time as wellvasta41 wrote:These are late.
Thank you so much for the help, if it wasn't for you we still wouldn't fixed some issues, updated the goal and making the video on last daysJocu wrote:Hey guys, sorry I didn't get chance to send the email I mentioned but I think you addressed the most pressing issues. Looking good and well done on such a great looking deck!
I hope all creators have this such a spirit 
I agree with you on that somehow but it was hard for us to edit them in last days, we were so busy and got a bad cold so we couldn't think/work on that, but thanks for mentioningscottbre wrote:In for 2!
Are the Ace pip designs finalized yet? They have very inconsistent widths and I'd love to see them a bit more consistent in how much space each one occupies on the card.
Congratz on thatDecknowledgy wrote: 1st Backer for the very first time!!!
But why would that make a difference? You pay at the end of the campaign, not when you pledge?Harvonsgard wrote:Almost 40%. It's looking just fine. Don't forget that a wallet breaker just ended with Keymaster and Crypt is in the books as well. After the end of the month folks will have new funds to back.
And don’t forget Steve Minty’s campaign that is going to end in a few days.justplaycards wrote:But why would that make a difference? You pay at the end of the campaign, not when you pledge?Harvonsgard wrote:Almost 40%. It's looking just fine. Don't forget that a wallet breaker just ended with Keymaster and Crypt is in the books as well. After the end of the month folks will have new funds to back.
I do agree the timing wasn't great with two of the biggest names either ending their KS or launching a new deck. Especially with Lotrek allowing people to split over two months. Hopefully these will still get funded though.
the main reason we launched it in March was the occasion, March is Women's History month, but we are half way there 50%, thanks to all of you and other backers outside UC. 
Yes we wanted to be straight forward and since this is our first serious experience we wanted to keep it a small project cuz of unforeseen issues/costs etc. We received some suggestions about having second edition/gilded and wanted to share it with you, but I guess we might stick to one edition, bcuz adding the white edition will cost 5-6k $ more and that might be a high price as a stretch goal and will be hard to hit (i'm just saying it by studying other campaigns). but gilded would cost 1500$ more and easier to hit. It's a hard decision for a first timer, but would appreciate if anyone has suggestion.sms69x wrote:Great about hitting the goal, that's really fantastic news, I want this deck im my collection.
As for another version, what I see so far is just a tuck swap, even if you do a different color for the back, that's not something I'm interested in. One of the things I found more refreshing about this campaign (aaside from the art) was the fact that there was just one deck, and that is something that most designers are not doing today. In every campaign we find at least 2 versions and that's very annoying for me. Guess this was just a matter of thme for this campaign also...
As for the gilding edition, that's ok, I guess.
Let's hit the goal.
I am in pretty much in agreement with this. Especially with a little bit of budget tightening due to the current economic situation I think it is a nice change of pace to just have one deck to pledge towards and not have to be disappointed about missing out on different variation, especially if it is just tuck colour changes or gilding.STLBluesNut wrote:The white tuck does look good. However, I agree having one deck only is good when the cards will be the same. I am kind of over buying multiple editions with just the tuck and card back color being different. A gilded deck is what drew me into card collecting but the novelty has kind of worn off since. If it were a completely different deck with different I may bite.
it's much more stressful and we are a bit worried about costs, hope there will be not much unforeseen issues and surprises I can't thank you enough, if it wasn't for you we wouldn't even started this project and here we are, this is coming to reality Users browsing this forum: brownsl, Honeybee, iorn, KGthePrince, RandyButterfield and 7 guests