![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
For that, you may want to contact folks @ CloveStPress here http://www.clovestpress.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; or Eddie from GW.montenzi wrote:Hmmmyes. I think borderless works better for this design. Do you know the guy who can put USPCC's decks into 3rd party boxes?![]()
![]()
![]()
they must beBruno wrote:Well .... are all kings dark ?
Sorry ....
MagikFingerz wrote:I still like #1 the best
Design is a process. I am very limited by the borderless back design. It does not work well with court cards. I can also change the color scheme from greenBruno wrote:sigh.
I have to disagree, respectfully of course. The lightning bolt is exactly that, and thus is more removed from the original "wave" concept IMO. I also think not offerings these in a borderless version would be a travesty, but I think everyone here knows my feelings towards bordersflashcards wrote:I'll admit that I did not care for the original design; hated it actually. I own your other decks and was frankly disappointed. However, I really like the direction in which you have gone. The waves on the faces really flow now. I agree with your decision on the bordered back- I think border less would look a bit cheap. The "lightning bolt" back really improves the visual interest. The ice blue really sealed it for me however. I think bold colors rather than pastels really makes the back design feel more powerful. I would to see an "ice" green. In any case, this is quickly turning into a "must have" for me. Keep up the good work- it's only getting better.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests