Page 2 of 2
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 2:46 am
by PipChick
Bradius wrote:Uh...Wild Turkeys do fly. They can fly rather well, even if usually short distances. If they don’t get hunted, even wild turkeys can get rather bold around people eventually.
sounds like it could be a real cluster pluck...
sorry, that was fowl.
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 6:30 am
by Bradius
Hey, if Benjamin Franklin has his way, the Turkey would be our national bird. Given how well they are camouflaged in Washington DC, that does make sense. It would be had to find them amongst our elected officials.
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 6:40 am
by Merlebird
Bradius wrote:Hey, if Benjamin Franklin has his way, the Turkey would be our national bird. Given how well they are camouflaged in Washington DC, that does make sense. It would be [hard] to find them amongst our elected officials.
Those aren't turkeys, they're chickenhawks.
![Ugly Think :ugthink:](./images/smilies/icon_uglythink.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 7:00 am
by Lotrek
I'm not sure I'm following you but it's fun anyway...
![Ugly Think :ugthink:](./images/smilies/icon_uglythink.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2018 7:48 am
by PipChick
Merlebird wrote:Bradius wrote:Hey, if Benjamin Franklin has his way, the Turkey would be our national bird. Given how well they are camouflaged in Washington DC, that does make sense. It would be [hard] to find them amongst our elected officials.
Those aren't turkeys, they're chickenhawks.
![Ugly Think :ugthink:](./images/smilies/icon_uglythink.gif)
this is the 'eagle' we have here hanging in the German parliament...
definitely looks more chicken; but maybe this was the 'chickenhawk' they were going for lol
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 4:29 am
by Lotrek
![ace_back1.lo.jpeg](./download/file.php?id=18776&sid=ec75a2eb800b20c03c556127b2c20556)
- ace_back1.lo.jpeg (390.06 KiB) Viewed 1945 times
![sheet.2.lo.jpeg](./download/file.php?id=18777&sid=ec75a2eb800b20c03c556127b2c20556)
- sheet.2.lo.jpeg (355.12 KiB) Viewed 1945 times
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 5:07 am
by JacksandJokers
OMG, I definitely need LESS
(I also need my few outstanding items, Hint, Hint)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 6:51 am
by PipChick
please show us more
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 7:04 am
by Bradius
It is not a minimalist deck, but simple for Lotrek. The words that come to my mind are elegant and simple. It is definitely a nicely designed deck. Bravo.
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 7:32 am
by JacksandJokers
Bradius wrote:It is not a minimalist deck, but simple for Lotrek. The words that come to my mind are elegant and simple. It is definitely a nicely designed deck. Bravo.
Agreed.
It looks simple but very elegant at the same time.
I'm loving the back design & the colour of the courts, Hopefully there'll be a few luxury touches added to the tuck box.
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 11:55 am
by Lotrek
I've been struggling lately with the idea of a minimalistic deck. I came to the conclusion that playing cards and strictly minimal design do not really appeal to me. However, taking the amount of detail down to the minimum needed for an elegant design can be a fascinating thing to try. So I decided that instead of trying to do a minimalistic deck, I would try to design a deck with LESS elements. Believe me, doing this is equally difficult as doing an intricate deck. My solutions are the use of only 2 colors on each card and only 3 colors in total (Black, deep red and silver). A double sided stock (pearlescent white and black and a portion of an intricate back design, opening the appetite for MORE to come.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 9:22 am
by Lotrek
![jok.JPG](./download/file.php?id=18790&sid=ec75a2eb800b20c03c556127b2c20556)
- jok.JPG (320.96 KiB) Viewed 1988 times
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 9:46 am
by Lotrek
![unc.jpg](./download/file.php?id=18791&sid=ec75a2eb800b20c03c556127b2c20556)
- unc.jpg (451.3 KiB) Viewed 1982 times
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 10:13 am
by RichK
Nice! I need it!
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 10:46 am
by Bradius
I don’t see too many of these types of decks. The closest to it I have recently is the Essentia Deck.
I am liking your version more. Although I think Mankin Chan did a good job as well.
I like how there are elements like the scroll and vine work and indices that I immediately associate with you, but crowns that have been simplified. I also like how you eliminate the arms, but keep nice hands.
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 11:26 am
by RichK
Bradius wrote:I like how there are elements like the scroll and vine work and indices that I immediately associate with you, but crowns that have been simplified. I also like how you eliminate the arms, but keep nice hands.
So that's why it's LESS, no arms.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2018 10:43 pm
by Eric Lee
Glad you didn't go Minimalist. A friend sent this my way. Ultimate minimalism :
https://www.areaware.com/products/minim ... =472356541" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
However considering you are calling this Less, I feel the courts have too much detail on them. Have you tried removing the patterns on the courts. Would be interesting to see them with just the lines of their clothes and different shades of solid colour making up the patterns or give them some texture. That would truly be less.
Of course, considering Lotrek's past decks, this deck really is less in comparison to his previous projects! Hopefully the price will also be a lot less...
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
![MinimPlayingCards_3600x@2x.jpg (11.29 KiB) Viewed 1838 times Ultimate minimal playing cards](./download/file.php?id=19213&t=1&sid=ec75a2eb800b20c03c556127b2c20556)
- Ultimate minimal playing cards
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:17 am
by Lotrek
"LESS" is literal: It should not be confused with "FEW". The deck has less elements than what I usually do but it's not a minimalistic deck. I think there is nothing more difficult than a minimalistic deck which doesn't seem lazy.
Anyway, the deck is already printed and there are two versions: Gold and silver. It will be released after summer and the price will be normal.
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:21 am
by JacksandJokers
I like it.
From what I can see of the back design it is reminiscent of the Venexiana Dark decks.
Lotrek wrote: It will be released after summer and the price will be normal.
A Normal priced Lotrek deck - I can hear the crowds cheering for miles around
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: Do you think you need LESS playing cards?
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:30 pm
by Eric Lee
Ooo... should have saved my comments till I saw more. This is very nice. Simple and elegant. However, considering all the different decks Lotrek's produced, what's normal price these days for Lotrek? Player's edition KS prices? (I'm half joking here)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)