![](http://www.kicktraq.com/projects/585926215/medieval-playing-cards/minichart.png)
Hello guys.
Today I wanna introduce my new deck - Renaissance. Hope you lite it.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Planning to launch on Kickstarter 26th July 2016
Printer - LPCC.
![Image](http://anomaly-world.com/img/PCF%20banner.jpg)
![Image](http://anomaly-world.com/img/deck%20bw.jpg)
![Image](http://anomaly-world.com/img/front%20+%20back%20tuck2.jpg)
![Image](http://anomaly-world.com/img/Renaissance%20aces%20BW.jpg)
![Image](http://anomaly-world.com/img/Renaissance%20simple%20BW.jpg)
![Image](http://anomaly-world.com/img/Renaissance%20kings%20BW.jpg)
Thank you!vasta41 wrote:The drawings are fantastic- great attention to detail. I'm not a huge fan of the tuck front and assuming that the back of the tuck is the back of the cards, I don't like how it's one-way. Speaking of which I like the courts but also don't like how they're one-way.
Thank you for your feedback.sinjin7 wrote:Really nice back design, I'd like to see more courts. Specifically, how the Kings will be different from the Jacks. From the appearance of the front of your tuck box, it looks like you put all this work into the back and court cards and didn't have anymore energy for the tuck box design, so you just slapped a picture of your King of Spades on the front of the tuck. With all due respect, I think this can be improved upon. The back of the tuck is fine since it references your back design, but since your back design itself is so nice, why not just put that on the back of the tuck box since that is what is traditionally done anyway?
I would strongly recommend taking a look at the Uusi Classic tuck box for inspiration for your tuck box layout since they are thematically similar design-wise. Or better yet, emulate Jackson Robinson's tuck box for his Sherlock Holmes decks if you want a fancier tuck box. I believe your design can utilize a similar intricate embossing and foiling technique to great effect.
Thank yousms69x wrote:That's a strong deck! Oddly enough the less appealing part (for me) are the court cards, all the rest looks great! And that back design, really good.
Congrats!
I agree with sms here, the court cards are a bit off for me. Maybe it's because they're looking directly at me? I wonder how they'd look if they looked to the side...sms69x wrote:That's a strong deck! Oddly enough the less appealing part (for me) are the court cards, all the rest looks great! And that back design, really good.
Congrats!
Thank you! But why?volantangel wrote:Looking great, any chance you might want to revisit your spade pip ? I really dont like it
It's a little droopy.EgorKlychnyk wrote:Thank you! But why?volantangel wrote:Looking great, any chance you might want to revisit your spade pip ? I really dont like it![]()
Thanks!TGunitedcardists wrote:I really like the back design.
I'm not a fan of the courts or the spade pip. In addition, I really like the pips to be on both the top and bottom of the card, not just the top.
I absolutely love the jokers.
I would have loved to see the back design on a more traditional deck around this theme.
sinjin7 wrote:That custom seal is a bad idea. With the way the flap is printed, to close the tuck with the flap outside breaks up the continuity of the back design of the tuck box. Plus, after you break the seal to open the box, what happens to it? You would have to tuck the top flap back into the box to securely close it and all you would have left is a fragment of the seal still stuck in the middle of the tuck box's back design, which again, would be marring the back design of the box. This is not a well conceived design and I would choose a different stretch goal.
If you want to keep the concept of the flap outside of the box with the seal, then you need to change the printing of the flap so that it blends in with the back design. You would have to somehow figure out a way to make the seal re-usable after opening the box as well, or else it pretty much becomes useless and in the way after you open the box for the first time.
Users browsing this forum: Disenchanted_11, Google [Bot], Strag and 12 guests