
Match box or deck or cards?
Cuz why not!?!? I think it's really cool and innovative.shermjack wrote: All kidding aside, I am quite intrigued about this deck and why they would put a matchbox striker on it.
Yeah, there are a lot of cool and innovative things that can be done with a tuck, but a matchbox striker?vasta41 wrote:Cuz why not!?!? I think it's really cool and innovative.shermjack wrote: All kidding aside, I am quite intrigued about this deck and why they would put a matchbox striker on it.
I don't know, I actually think that they meant it to be part of the tuck...looking at the words 'Venture Onward', the pic of a tent in the outdoors, plus the mention by the Buck Twins on their instagram about loving the great outdoors, I am thinking it is an Outdoorsy deck....guess we'll see on Black FridayFes wrote:In the photo it looks like it's glued on fellas.
You'd think coming up with 12 forest themed cliparts would be pretty easy, huh?th4mo wrote:My money's on repeating courts...
Worse- they're not even courts!th4mo wrote:My money's on repeating courts...
I literally loled when I read that thinking, "Is he crazy!?" until I read your next statement:sinjin7 wrote:Almost makes me miss Brad Fulton.
...then I loled againsinjin7 wrote:Almost.
PrincessTrouble wrote:Bradley Mountain is calling them Adventure cards and Dan & Dave are calling them Camp cards. They need to get on the same page.
jerichoholic wrote:Wow, repeating courts, how lame. How come none of these design firms can figure out how to design a deck of cards? They all turn out like most of the Deckstarter decks. And why D&D and Art of Play keeps selling stuff like this I don't know. Personally I think if you are going to put in the effort to design a deck, then go the whole way and don't just design 3 court cards and a joker.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Honeybee, KGthePrince, Oneiros88 and 7 guests