The 52+Jokers 2015 Club deck. It was a pleasure to work on this one! Exclusive to club members right now, and available at Encarded.com in November!





The 52+Jokers 2015 Club deck. It was a pleasure to work on this one! Exclusive to club members right now, and available at Encarded.com in November!
This is from the PCF:sinjin7 wrote:As many have said, nice tuck but I don't really care for the back design, nor the color scheme of the back. The foil on the back of the cards are nice as well, but I find that the number one reason why court cards aren't shown in preview pics is because they're usually merely standard courts. This isn't a must-own deck for me (none of the 52+ decks are) so I'll have to rely on one of you to let me know if the courts are custom or just standard.
Well that depends on what your interested in.. Joining the 52 plus joker club has a few benefits, first you get access to Monthly Card Culture published online, then they also print Clear The Deck printed quarterly and sent to you (no extra charge).misterharmanko wrote:I'm not a 52+J member so hoping someone can tell me is it worth joining to get this deck?
What price are they selling it for & is there a limit to how many we can buy
I agree with you about Paul being 1 of the few professionals.. But I think the faces of the cards had been left with slight modification on purpose. Similar to the 2014 club deck, even Jackson did a slight modification to the faces. I can only assume that the club intended the use standard faces to keep the originality of the playing cards and keeping it close to its history.th4mo wrote:I have a lot of respect for Paul. He has been around a (relatively) long time, and he is among the few true professionals in the custom playing card business who deliver every time. And he continues to try to push the boundaries.
However, it has been a long time since I've been wowed by any of his designs. He seems to put all his energy into the boxes, and very little into the card faces. Since I have no interest in 52+J, this is a really easy pass for me, especially with standard courts.
That's a good point. Plus, i'm sure these were put together on a pretty tight timeline to get them printed in time for the conference. I wasn't impressed with Jackson's deck from last year either.52JokesandCounting wrote:I agree with you about Paul being 1 of the few professionals.. But I think the faces of the cards had been left with slight modification on purpose. Similar to the 2014 club deck, even Jackson did a slight modification to the faces. I can only assume that the club intended the use standard faces to keep the originality of the playing cards and keeping it close to its history.th4mo wrote:I have a lot of respect for Paul. He has been around a (relatively) long time, and he is among the few true professionals in the custom playing card business who deliver every time. And he continues to try to push the boundaries.
However, it has been a long time since I've been wowed by any of his designs. He seems to put all his energy into the boxes, and very little into the card faces. Since I have no interest in 52+J, this is a really easy pass for me, especially with standard courts.
It was actually 500 for the telescoping tucks..Mike Ratledge wrote:Three for $60, pretty reasonable. I notice that the series expanded to 1000 this time. I guess 200 was just not practical for those hand made telescoping tucks.
I was very impressed with Jackson's deck I got 3. It was a 2 part tuck box. Who does that nowadays? I sold 2 of those decks to friends who were not members. I'm wondering who is going to make the next one. It seems to be an annual thing with the Joker being the "52Plus Crescent Joker".th4mo wrote: I wasn't impressed with Jackson's deck from last year either.
I agree with you Sprouts, the slip case was an awesome thing. I like the 52 design on Jacksons deck as well though, picked up a brick of the golds and have been enjoying them. I felt it was done with class and the layout is interesting to the eye even though it was a departure from Jackson's usual style. Very cool stuff in my opinion.sprouts1115 wrote:I was very impressed with Jackson's deck I got 3. It was a 2 part tuck box. Who does that nowadays? I sold 2 of those decks to friends who were not members. I'm wondering who is going to make the next one. It seems to be an annual thing with the Joker being the "52Plus Crescent Joker".th4mo wrote: I wasn't impressed with Jackson's deck from last year either.
Here is a scan of most of the courts:th4mo wrote: btw, could someone please post images of the courts? Paul says they are not "bog-standard", but doesn't even bother to post them on his Encarded site. 7 shots of the box, but not one face card...![]()
Not showing the courts to me always indicates they are standard or too close to standard to show off...
PrincessTrouble wrote:I can tell the difference between the heart and diamond pip colors. But with the spades and clubs, I really can't discern the difference in the shades of gray/black for the pips. That bugs me, but otherwise I'm pleased with the deck.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], brownsl, Google Feedfetcher, Honeybee, Oneiros88 and 7 guests