








+1.Cbkimble wrote:Unless there are some major differences from the original, I doubt I'll give them a seco d thought.
Have to agree gums on a skull is a bit unnerving, but sugar skulls do break all the rules. Looks like he is going with a big central element with a standard dual mirror element with a big central and corner badges that look like flowers. Purple is good. I guess.Eoghann wrote:DOTD v2? That back looks fun. The skull lips are pretty unnerving but you know I'm in.
ETA?
Same here. They should have gone with a different direction than using the same skull back.Cbkimble wrote:Unless there are some major differences from the original, I doubt I'll give them a seco d thought.
I'd be okay with this as long as everything else (tuck, courts, etc.) is more different. With the "new" backs as they are, if the courts and/or tucks are similar to v1 then I'll probably pass on these.Yashi wrote:Same here. They should have gone with a different direction than using the same skull back.Cbkimble wrote:Unless there are some major differences from the original, I doubt I'll give them a seco d thought.
Exactly my issue - whilst I do like the new design - it is hard to justify after just purchasing quite a few in the original project as well as other DotD and similarly themed decks.Widdee wrote:Loved the first run and bought heavy, just not sure whether this is significantly different enough.
Ooooh. Good point.Cbkimble wrote:I'm waiting on grimoir and mardi gras, I'll pass on these.
Users browsing this forum: brownsl, vasta41, veil, wonderfulfacts and 15 guests