Marcus wrote:I've always appreciated your posts on here, John - it's usually honest and any opinions are backed up with your reasoning behind it - but for the last few months it's not been pretty.
And please, let's try and have a civil approach here instead of giving in to raw emotions, mob mentality or just us having a bad day. I'm all for people having the right to express their opinion, but damn it people - it doesn't have to be done in the worst way possible, and you don't have to pile on just because everyone else is doing so. Saying "These are priced way too high for me, I'm out" will in the end get you a lot further than accusations, conspiracy theories and guesses that is pulled from your...Alvus, to tie up this topic nice and neatly.
I can't speak about other people's posts about KW or Jackson, but as for my comments about KW/Jackson, I've always tried to be civil, professional, and well-reasoned. I honestly don't see how my posts here in this thread, or any other thread have "not been pretty" over the last few months. So I called Jackson arrogant, and that was only in the context of SpecialK's response to my post: I didn't use profanity, didn't reference his mother or sister, didn't accuse or propose a conspiracy theory. If you consider that raw emotion or not pretty or spoken in the worst way possible, then I don't know what to say.
I never knock Jackson about his talent or art (which is all subjective anyways) and give him credit and even defended him in that regards here at UC. I've said on multiple occasions that I think the Hive was a very nice deck, and I rank Brendan's court cards as the third best courts produced in 2014 in a year where there were
many wonderful court cards produced. Since this is the thread for the Hive 2, I can't understand why it is so wrong to discuss the marketing debacle that happened with the original Hive deck, because it could be very relevant to how the Hive 2 could be marketed and priced.
Marcus, I have a lot of respect for your contributions to UC and your perspective based upon your experience in this industry, but I'm going to have to politely disagree with you here and stand by every comment and post made in this thread. I have my reasons to have the opinion I have of Jackson and Brendan (and yes, that is exactly the post I was referencing about Brendan's snide comment) and I'll be more than happy to further discuss this by PM so we don't clutter and hijack this thread any more than we need to.