![http://www.bmpokerworld.com/images/bicycle/bicycle-img111-big.jpg](http://www.bmpokerworld.com/images/bicycle/bicycle-img111-big.jpg)
what was I saying?.... I forgot
Maybe because it's not made by USPCC. I'm not picky about EPCC or USPCC but I would have loved for this to be USPCC. I'm still keeping my pledge for now though.ecNate wrote:Ugh, how is this project not funded yet? This would easily be my favorite 'whimsical' deck and the artwork on this is awesome. I just bumped up for a shirt too, something I NEVER do.
What's up? I realize it's an odd theme, but it's so well done I can't see why everybody wouldn't want one. Even if not for a collection, just to play with, because fun.
The gorilla background is one-way, it's a problem. But I too like the artwork, and I am a backer.ecNate wrote:Ugh, how is this project not funded yet? This would easily be my favorite 'whimsical' deck and the artwork on this is awesome. I just bumped up for a shirt too, something I NEVER do.
What's up? I realize it's an odd theme, but it's so well done I can't see why everybody wouldn't want one. Even if not for a collection, just to play with, because fun.
This deck is great. I've seen a lot of sh*tty projects funded. This one is excellent with a realistic goal. I like the fact EPCC was chosen to print the decks.ecNate wrote:Ugh, how is this project not funded yet? This would easily be my favorite 'whimsical' deck and the artwork on this is awesome. I just bumped up for a shirt too, something I NEVER do.
What's up? I realize it's an odd theme, but it's so well done I can't see why everybody wouldn't want one. Even if not for a collection, just to play with, because fun.
I feel the same way. I would be in on this deck if it were marketed as a Bicycle branded deck with a "Gorilla back" rather than what it is now.MagikFingerz wrote:I don't usually mind either way (EPCC or USPCC), but seeing as this is basically a parody of/homage to the classic Rider Back it just seems a bit "wrong" for it not to be printed by USPCC.
People with personal and or financial stakes in the EPCC/LPCC would say things of that nature....sprouts1115 wrote:Everyone knows USPCC is the 800 pound gorilla in the room. I like the parody. Did you hear that? Is that Don from the Discourse? I smell him. I think he is a lurker on the UC. I have to give him credit. He says that a lot about the USPCC...
@daveEdgerly - Nothing wrong with your cards. Your %50 there. You might make it.
I think it's bad timing. A lot of people are holding back, because there is a lot of stuff in the pipeline this summer from other people. I think that cards look great.daveEdgerly wrote:After doing multiple decks with USPCC, I really wanted to give EPCC a try. I honestly didn't think that using EPCC for this deck would be an issue. That being said, I don't believe "who" is printing the cards is the issue either. I'm starting to think that the playing card world just isn't ready for this deck. I've tried multiple add ons, free coins, and cross promotions, and the numbers just won't get moving. I'm not giving up on it, I'm just wondering if there is something I haven't tried.
The artwork on this deck is very well executed. It feels like you may have been marketing not into the correct crowds. It's a given that we want to focus on the true card collectors but it seems like those truly seeking the unusual would almost embrace the deck more. I could see someone paying $20 for this deck in some of my neighborhood boutiques. Some of my friends pay top dollar for that kind of differentiation. This may just be an issue of missing a large supporting demographic? This deck may not be embraced by performing magicians or cardists because of the gorilla faces, but maybe the biggest supporting demographic would be people that actually wanted to play and enjoy the awesome artwork with these out of box with friends, aka the average layman. I would try contacting some blogs that carry similar items to this to get a last push. It's just a guess but it's an action step that could help you close your goal. Best of luck.daveEdgerly wrote:After doing multiple decks with USPCC, I really wanted to give EPCC a try. I honestly didn't think that using EPCC for this deck would be an issue. That being said, I don't believe "who" is printing the cards is the issue either. I'm starting to think that the playing card world just isn't ready for this deck. I've tried multiple add ons, free coins, and cross promotions, and the numbers just won't get moving. I'm not giving up on it, I'm just wondering if there is something I haven't tried.
This is true for MOST decks on KS though. Sadly.Strag wrote:My reason for not back was cost. $16ea for 2 decks shipped international is just too high when it is VERY likely that, if funded, the decks would be available from a local retailer for less. It's an unfortunately fact of the business that international mail costs are too high and costs a deck like this pledges. Projects that have multiple decks fare better as they are able to spread the shipping costs over more decks and get the costs down overall per deck. This is one of the factors of my purchasing decision.
daveEdgerly wrote:What do you all think about this? i have submitted the design to the USPCC to see if their legal department will go for it.
Users browsing this forum: Disenchanted_11, HFMJ, Magisterrene and 19 guests