data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe290/fe290c5ed53a0a3c1f8d6f4680876bf93c3c1557" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e172a/e172a40093470f2a6e2ede601678dca3b296bf1a" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac8f7/ac8f704c2b06737f823ad2fb6de94e7a355c497c" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/373a0/373a0cadaf4289b0250d4a938c1594b7da7031e3" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d601/3d6019efd620d8723a27b86f0deffc60f046be23" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/807fb/807fb28326604a285f753c14c91f92768d2d0444" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8c5f/b8c5fcf03577b5f75ef30a94479070a114ef62b8" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7431/f74319bbaa3ff9b03f108ab03e298ca4e715fb70" alt="Image"
If they didn't have those repeating courts I'll be all over this. I love the style but drop the words and the back design can be more refined. Seem like this is a swing and a miss.th4mo wrote:Not a home run for me, either.
And while not technically "repeating courts", there does not seem to be a whole lot of variation between them...
Check again, they have specific pledges for US and non-US. In fact, the shipping for International is quite reasonable!vjose32 wrote:Only ships to US - pass!
If these didnt have repeating courts ill probably be in for the $60 tierStrag wrote:Check again, they have specific pledges for US and non-US. In fact, the shipping for International is quite reasonable!vjose32 wrote:Only ships to US - pass!
All right!!! Thanks for your efforts, sounds fantastic.kkalashian wrote:I wanted to thank you all again for the feedback and the support - we are definitely taking it all to heart and are going to be coming up with new designs for the BACK of the card which don't have any text. We are going to develop three or four designs and then let the backers vote - I am going to post an update on the campaign shortly. We are also coming up with some alternate court cards to keep things interesting. The only thing is that we want to keep the animals specific to the Pocono area, so stay tuned for those new designs as well. We want to make the deck as great as possible and I know we will get there! Thanks again.
I'm excited to hear this. I love animal decks but this one felt a little repetitive to me, with all the courts being the same. I look forward to seeing the new courts!kkalashian wrote:I wanted to thank you all again for the feedback and the support - we are definitely taking it all to heart and are going to be coming up with new designs for the BACK of the card which don't have any text. We are going to develop three or four designs and then let the backers vote - I am going to post an update on the campaign shortly. We are also coming up with some alternate court cards to keep things interesting. The only thing is that we want to keep the animals specific to the Pocono area, so stay tuned for those new designs as well. We want to make the deck as great as possible and I know we will get there! Thanks again.
When you're replying, instead of quick reply choose full editor. There you will see a UCIMG button. Press that and copy your image link in between both brackets.kkalashian wrote:We just put the new back designs on our campaign (I was unable to figure out how to post them here so if someone could fill me in, I'd love to do that too) - we are going to have the supporters vote - We are also going to be doing new Court Cards to add to the existing - we did options with all different animals and thought they were too confusing but we will have four different versions of each animal which I think you will enjoy! We have taken your advice to heart and removed the text on the back (as well as the court cards coming out) and we have some more options to come. Thanks again for all your feedback! - Kraig
Code: Select all
[ucimg]www.image.jpg[/ucimg]
Or click the "Post Reply" button in the lower left cornerEoghann wrote:When you're replying, instead of quick reply choose full editor.
Completely agree. Something's just not right with 1 and 2, the spyglass effect just looks a bit strange. And I don't like 4 at all, despite my past expressions of fondness for borderless designs.Widdee wrote:Three is the only true two-way and first impression I liked it best. Like the black borders on 2 and 3.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Disenchanted_11, Haru2011 and 43 guests