![](http://www.kicktraq.com/projects/45166364/bicycle-comic-cards-playing-cards/minichart.png)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/001/207/888/5f46706a8ce8723632347fde48eb4954_large.jpg?1382111996)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/001/224/126/410ca24888ee903854233f468053e080_large.jpg?1382456285)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/001/203/528/07bc82d497764a8e18571675578f0b6c_large.jpg?1382034564)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/001/211/958/07d5d369f5c5dfd417798dc3224eec40_large.jpg?1382199557)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/001/206/761/f94142356e495b7c0b471df82b65358e_large.jpg?1382082222)
It's not just the Comic-Con name that would need permission. I know the Court images are supposed to depict Con visitors in costumes, but try to tell the Disney lawyers that the Jack of Spades is NOT Captain Jack Sparrow. I think they would have a different opinion!Ben Taylor wrote:Comic-Con is a registered trademark. I don't see anywhere that they got permission to use it.
The hyphen is pretty much irrelevant.badpete69 wrote:Cobey replied to me that he is using the comic con without the hyphen which is what is trademarked (in 1995).
+1vasta41 wrote:This is almost one of those decks I don't think the idea translates into playing cards. This might actually be a good combo if it's done right. And I don't think this is. Points for the idea but it needs to come a long way, IMO.
Reminds me of when I worked in Orlando and had some business dealings with the local authorities...the story going around was that Disney had every lawyer in the county on retainer. Talk about stacking the deckRandyButterfield wrote:It's not just the Comic-Con name that would need permission. I know the Court images are supposed to depict Con visitors in costumes, but try to tell the Disney lawyers that the Jack of Spades is NOT Captain Jack Sparrow. I think they would have a different opinion!Ben Taylor wrote:Comic-Con is a registered trademark. I don't see anywhere that they got permission to use it.
Same with the Dr. Who Tardis.
thanks, Randy
Well, obviously they didn't have permission, and the name has changed, so I updated the OP with the new KS & KickTraq'ers. I sure wouldn't doubt that they have a lawyer on retainer in every county in the country, frankly. They are tight and they are effective on defending their IP to a fault, really (and they WILL beat you to death with attorneys!)...YoYoSpin wrote:Reminds me of when I worked in Orlando and had some business dealings with the local authorities...the story going around was that Disney had every lawyer in the county on retainer. Talk about stacking the deckRandyButterfield wrote:It's not just the Comic-Con name that would need permission. I know the Court images are supposed to depict Con visitors in costumes, but try to tell the Disney lawyers that the Jack of Spades is NOT Captain Jack Sparrow. I think they would have a different opinion!Ben Taylor wrote:Comic-Con is a registered trademark. I don't see anywhere that they got permission to use it.
Same with the Dr. Who Tardis.
thanks, Randy
I disagree. IMO comics doesn't fit on playing cards any more than copy-pasted pictures. I didn't buy the MMD's, and I won't be getting these either. Though I can't really say how a comic book deck SHOULD be made, it might not even be possible (to do well).montecarlojoe wrote:I think it's a missed opportunity to create a Comic Book deck that doesn't form a comic book (like the MMD series)
I've seen that artwork countless times but had no idea it was inspired by a DC comic. Thanks for the education, MCJ!montecarlojoe wrote:Yeah - Licensing would be a nightmare. Disney isn't really known for giving stuff away for free!
I think it could be done, if it were more abstract - in the same way as Litchenstien pop art riffs on 50s Comic strips without actuially copying any.
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/lic ... aam-t00897
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Evilgamer, HFMJ, Leo Scherfig, mulrich, niktok, Oneiros88 and 9 guests