Reflections by Emilysleights52
- kevork
- Member
- Posts: 3074
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 12:54 am
- Collector: Yes
- White Whale: NPCCD 17 Amethyst + Prototypes
- Decks Owned: 1100
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 3054 times
- Been thanked: 4153 times
Reflections by Emilysleights52
Emily has been transparent about her own mental health struggles, and her two most recent decks appear to be reflections of this. Pun intended.
KS September 17th, 12pm EDT.
KS September 17th, 12pm EDT.
@playingcardophile
[BUY] NPCCD Decks (Priority 2017 NPCCD Amethyst + Platinum)
[BUY] Complete Lotrek Collection
[BUY] NPCCD Decks (Priority 2017 NPCCD Amethyst + Platinum)
[BUY] Complete Lotrek Collection
- laitostarr777
- Member
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:34 pm
- Cardist: Yes
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Magician: Yes
- White Whale: 2019 NPCCD - KWP decks
- Decks Owned: 200
- Location: Indonesia
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
Never mentioned on the Campaign Page, only we know that the printer is Kingstar applying cold silver foil
The markings will be Reader type
A furry who has a sona of a magician ;3
My collection - https://www.portfolio52.com/profile/16212/collection
Instagram - @laitostarr777
My collection - https://www.portfolio52.com/profile/16212/collection
Instagram - @laitostarr777
- rousselle
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4914
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:35 pm
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Magician: Yes
- Has thanked: 7805 times
- Been thanked: 2648 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
Saw sample versions at the 52+J convention. These are on my short list of things to get if the pricing works out. Shiny.
This space intentionally left blank.
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2024 12:41 pm
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 63 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
Are the markings more or less noticeable than black roses? Same ish?
- rousselle
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4914
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:35 pm
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Magician: Yes
- Has thanked: 7805 times
- Been thanked: 2648 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
Since I don't happen to have black roses, I can't really compare. So as someone who was not already familiar with that marking system, I can say with confidence that the markings are not at all obvious to the uninitiated observer.
This space intentionally left blank.
- laitostarr777
- Member
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:34 pm
- Cardist: Yes
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Magician: Yes
- White Whale: 2019 NPCCD - KWP decks
- Decks Owned: 200
- Location: Indonesia
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
I received Reflection Playing Cards, and I can say it is less noticable - it blends in within the filigree elements on the back design. Let's try figuring out what card is this and you can judge yourself of how easy is the marking. And, unfortunately there's a mishap for the Ponder Edition - the tuck box sides reads "EPIPHANY" instead of "PONDER", so whoever backers who get Ponder, either Standard or Gilded, will received the misprint (like me ). The good news, the supplier is willing to fix this mistake, and will be sending the correct ones later.
A furry who has a sona of a magician ;3
My collection - https://www.portfolio52.com/profile/16212/collection
Instagram - @laitostarr777
My collection - https://www.portfolio52.com/profile/16212/collection
Instagram - @laitostarr777
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2024 12:41 pm
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 63 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
that's a real let down about the tucks. It's hard to see the marking especially if only seeing one card. J?laitostarr777 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 8:41 amI received Reflection Playing Cards, and I can say it is less noticable - it blends in within the filigree elements on the back design. Let's try figuring out what card is this and you can judge yourself of how easy is the marking.
IMG_3860.jpeg
And, unfortunately there's a mishap for the Ponder Edition - the tuck box sides reads "EPIPHANY" instead of "PONDER", so whoever backers who get Ponder, either Standard or Gilded, will received the misprint (like me ). The good news, the supplier is willing to fix this mistake, and will be sending the correct ones later.
- laitostarr777
- Member
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:34 pm
- Cardist: Yes
- Collector: Yes
- Player: Yes
- Magician: Yes
- White Whale: 2019 NPCCD - KWP decks
- Decks Owned: 200
- Location: Indonesia
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
BINGO! You are correct! The card is indeed J
A furry who has a sona of a magician ;3
My collection - https://www.portfolio52.com/profile/16212/collection
Instagram - @laitostarr777
My collection - https://www.portfolio52.com/profile/16212/collection
Instagram - @laitostarr777
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2024 12:41 pm
- Has thanked: 192 times
- Been thanked: 63 times
Re: Reflections by Emilysleights52
That card works alright since the j is unusual. I wonder about the others. Thanks for the insight.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], crazy_lazy, Fenrir, GandalfPC, wingedpotato and 28 guests