Disenchanted_11 wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 2:37 pm
manu wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 1:56 pm
At this point, its just a matter of trust I suppose. The evidence presented by that Reddit post is compelling (especially the part where the campaign description was changed). But I don't think there's a way of conclusively proving anything one way or another.
It's on Reddit after all, posted by someome with reliable credentials, all evidence encircled, and all "trust me bro" as sources. What can go wrong?
p.s. UC software acting up again, post keep getting lost after submitting.
i wasn’t really convinced. I like Nicolai Aaroe but not so much that it would trouble me to accept the analysis if there was a bit more substance to it.
The weird hands, teeth annd hat issues seemed a bit thin. If you were actively trying to conceal the use of AI, why would you leave things so glaringly obvious and easily fixable. Likewise, the ‘Other Self’ pseudonym is hardly concealment when his actual name appears in the contact page.
That said, I thought the changing of the campaign blurb was pretty suss and agree that the crossover vest seemed like a particularly unhuman-like element.
i just figure that an artist with a large body of quality work that predates AI probably deserves the benefit of the doubt if the issues raised are mostly just ‘fishiness’.
I’ll maintain a healthy level of suspicion moving forward but I’m not convinced either way.
Edit: meanwhile, Hoa Phan decks continue to fund