[Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Members are welcome and encouraged to "Show Their Cards" here. Don't be bashful!
Forum rules
  1. Make a new thread. Be sure to put your username in square brackets [] at the beginning of the title.

  2. Write a small (or big, if you want) introduction about you, your collection and your collecting habits.

  3. Post as many pictures of your decks as you want in your thread, with or without descriptions.
    (But please refrain from posting pictures of your collection in someone else's thread.)

  4. Have fun with it, be creative, and check out other users' threads as well :)

User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Lotrek mail day - Christmas in September...
Did not realize the Redemptions V had a blue tuck until I took this picture. Looks black in natural light.
20230916_181652.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Couple additional Tuck Uncuts added to my collection. Added to my Eye of the Ocean tucks with the red Intrepid tuck.
20230927_212847.jpg
Added Fable tuck
20230927_215718.jpg
Also got this little Gem, believe it is a test print of the Royal Silk tuck - really like the Gold on Black very reminiscent of the Icons Anniversary tuck colors.
20230930_112405.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Pulled this off ebay, been spending too much time on Acetofive's thread, expanding into some foreign decks. I got this due to the cool (bit tattered) box they came in. Tucks are really fragile cardboard.
20230930_113720.jpg
20230930_113739.jpg
20230930_113811.jpg
20230930_113916.jpg
20230930_113943.jpg
20230930_114736.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

REDEMPTIONS No.IV - Frost Silk Players
I really, really like how this deck turned out, so much I opened another deck to play around with the cards.
The cards are amazing, and the Silver Gilding looks fantastic. Took a few photos...

Redemptions Tuck - Mat Black with Silver Foil
SilkFrostDeckRedempFr.jpg
SilkFrostDeckRedempBck.jpg

Really like how he made it look like a Book with sides resembling gilded pages.
SilkFrostDeck1.jpg
SilkFrostDeck2.jpg
SilkFrostDeck3.jpg

Opening both Tucks to reveal the cards
SilkFrostRedemptOpen.jpg
SilkFrostDeckOpen.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Frost Silk Players Teal Tuck with Silver Foil
SilkFrostDeckPlayers.jpg
SilkFrostDeckSide.jpg
SilkFrostDeckBtm.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Finally the Silk Court Cards & Jokers
SilkFrostCrtsAce.jpg

Comes with 2 Jokers, Signed Card & Double Backer card
SilkFrostAceJoker.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Opened a Royal Silk Deck as well...
Needed to see what all the fuss was over.

I do find the fine level of detail on the Tuck Embossing amazing
20231007_150533.jpg
RoyalSilkBck.jpg
Tuck Opened... Lotrek really missed out on the Gilding, doesn't look like much at first.
RoyalSilkOpen.jpg
Well... all I can say is Gold Foil, Gold Foil & yes more Gold Foil.
The Gold Foiling on card back and faces, is over the top!
You have to look at the edges of the cards to see the color of the stock :ugthink:
RoyalSilkBckAce.jpg
RoyalSilkJkrAces.jpg
Full Spread of Courts...
RoyalSilkCrtAces2.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Adamthinks
Member
Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 3:36 am
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Decks Owned: 500
Location: Seattle
Has thanked: 2552 times
Been thanked: 1073 times
Contact:

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Adamthinks »

Is it just the pictures or is the bleed through really that significant with the Royal Silk?
jasonx73it
Member
Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2022 11:01 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: Blue Golden Oath
Location: Italy
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by jasonx73it »

Adamthinks wrote: Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:24 pm Is it just the pictures or is the bleed through really that significant with the Royal Silk?
It is noticeable
User avatar
kevork
Member
Member
Posts: 2922
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 12:54 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: NPCCD 17 Amethyst + Prototypes
Decks Owned: 1000
Location: California
Has thanked: 2923 times
Been thanked: 3916 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by kevork »

Shade wrote: Sat Sep 30, 2023 1:35 pm Also got this little Gem, believe it is a test print of the Royal Silk tuck - really like the Gold on Black very reminiscent of the Icons Anniversary tuck colors.
20230930_112405.jpg
A previous iteration of Royal Silk involved Gold foil on black card stock. This would've likely been the tuck for it prior to Lotrek opting to go with Red and Purple card stocks.
Adamthinks wrote: Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:24 pm Is it just the pictures or is the bleed through really that significant with the Royal Silk?
There is definitely bleed through on the final print of the deck. The card stock is very thin and I'm sure Lotrek had his reasons to do it this way, but the bleed through is unfortunate.
User avatar
Adamthinks
Member
Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 3:36 am
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Decks Owned: 500
Location: Seattle
Has thanked: 2552 times
Been thanked: 1073 times
Contact:

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Adamthinks »

kevork wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 1:50 pm
Shade wrote: Sat Sep 30, 2023 1:35 pm Also got this little Gem, believe it is a test print of the Royal Silk tuck - really like the Gold on Black very reminiscent of the Icons Anniversary tuck colors.
20230930_112405.jpg
A previous iteration of Royal Silk involved Gold foil on black card stock. This would've likely been the tuck for it prior to Lotrek opting to go with Red and Purple card stocks.
Adamthinks wrote: Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:24 pm Is it just the pictures or is the bleed through really that significant with the Royal Silk?
There is definitely bleed through on the final print of the deck. The card stock is very thin and I'm sure Lotrek had his reasons to do it this way, but the bleed through is unfortunate.

Man, after waiting all that time for it through many many many delays, I'd be pretty bummed and disillusioned about future orders.
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Adamthinks wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 6:54 pm
kevork wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2023 1:50 pm
A previous iteration of Royal Silk involved Gold foil on black card stock. This would've likely been the tuck for it prior to Lotrek opting to go with Red and Purple card stocks.
Adamthinks wrote: Sat Oct 07, 2023 8:24 pm Is it just the pictures or is the bleed through really that significant with the Royal Silk?
There is definitely bleed through on the final print of the deck. The card stock is very thin and I'm sure Lotrek had his reasons to do it this way, but the bleed through is unfortunate.

Man, after waiting all that time for it through many many many delays, I'd be pretty bummed and disillusioned about future orders.
I think there are a couple things going on here. First I believe the camera is picking up and magnifying the effect, similar to lint specs. I don't remember it being so noticeable with the naked eye. Although I was a bit dazzled by all the gold glare, and wasn't specifically looking for it. I did notice the chevron fields had spots that reflected the light differently. Second I think it is a product of the fine repeating chevron pattern in the field, where any slight variation of the stock from the pattern stamped on the back bleeds through the chevron pattern. So it is more noticeable on the cards with a lot of chevron field like Jokers and Aces. I didn't see much bleed on the backs which of course is the preference and allows the deck to still be playable. I think he probably stamped the back last to minimize the bleed from the front ( which is unfortunate since the card faces are the most interesting to look at :( ). He did mention it was the foiling he kept having problems with. Probably why it took him so long, trying to get a good balance, or at least as good as he could get it.

If I get some time this weekend I will pull the cards out again and go over them some more, I will take some more photos especially a spread of the backs.
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
kevork
Member
Member
Posts: 2922
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 12:54 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: NPCCD 17 Amethyst + Prototypes
Decks Owned: 1000
Location: California
Has thanked: 2923 times
Been thanked: 3916 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by kevork »

What's your go-to method for hanging frames on the wall? I'm trying to explore whether non-invasive options like 3M's command strip variations are feasible.
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

kevork wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:51 pm What's your go-to method for hanging frames on the wall? I'm trying to explore whether non-invasive options like 3M's command strip variations are feasible.
:mrgreen: A screw in the wall, I have used the hooks with 1 or 2 pins before (much smaller hole) but they usually have a flat hook and it does not work well with the sawtooth hangers on most small frames.

I tried the 3M on my LeChat uncut and it fell off twice. They are very sensitive to the material and how much surface area they contact. Luckily the LeChat only fell a couple inches, but I abandoned them too risky.
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Royal SIlk - Part 2

As promised some pics of the back spreads...
20231022_120829.jpg
20231022_120812.jpg

Some additional Pics - You most definitely can see it & it is very dependent on angle of view.
Aces and Jokers are the worst since they have such a large back ground field.
20231022_120900.jpg
20231022_120916.jpg
20231022_120941.jpg
20231022_120948.jpg
20231022_121001.jpg
20231022_121523.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

You can not see it on the Card Backs, and it is very minimal on the Court Cards.
20231022_121101.jpg
20231022_121112.jpg
20231022_121150.jpg
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
Shade
Member
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:09 pm
Collector: Yes
White Whale: No17 Crown Edition
Decks Owned: 4567
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 415 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Shade »

Is there a way to post videos (mp4)? I took some short clips of how the angle really affects the visibility of the bleed thru.
Better to Burn Out than Fade Away...
User avatar
GandalfPC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4702
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 12:01 pm
Cardist: Yes
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Magician: Yes
White Whale: Ambergris
Decks Owned: 1700
Location: New Mexico
Has thanked: 7539 times
Been thanked: 4375 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by GandalfPC »

Shade wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 3:15 pm Is there a way to post videos (mp4)? I took some short clips of how the angle really affects the visibility of the bleed thru.

Best way (only way?) to upload them to go through YouTube I think.
Hunting Karl Gerich and Elaine Lewis

My collection and tradelist: http://gandalfpc.great-site.net
User avatar
rousselle
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4906
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:35 pm
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Magician: Yes
Has thanked: 7757 times
Been thanked: 2642 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by rousselle »

Yeah, the bulletin board engine we're using here hasn't been updated in a while, so we don't have much of that fancy stuff. But, if I ever hear from Alex again, I'll bring up the topic with him (about being able to post short movies) and see what he says. :)
This space intentionally left blank.
User avatar
Honeybee
Member
Member
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 5:07 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: Cactus Standards Midnight
Decks Owned: 200
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2727 times
Been thanked: 819 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Honeybee »

I am interested in this term 'bleed' through. Is this the correct technical term for what is happening on Royal Silk and on the Tale of the Tempest Wylenti that I have posted here?
I believe Bleeding occurs when ink soaks through a piece of paper to the other side.
The other definiton: 'Bleed is a printing term that refers to when printed objects on a page, such as images, background color, or graphics, extend past where the publication will be trimmed' and is certainly not we are talking about

To me what we are seeing here is more a case of 'silhouetting' or 'ghosting' for want of a better term but neither are correct as they have different meanings in printing

The best I can come up with is: the Opaqueness (or Opacity) is insufficient.
Opacity: The quality of the paper defines the opaqueness of it. If it isn’t opaque enough, your design might show through to the other side.

Does anyone have a better term?
Thoughts?
Attachments
Wylenti 5.png
Wylenti.png
KoD - my initials, no wonder I grew up a lover of playing cards
Avatar - Honeybee (No.15+17) Tuck pic by Randy Butterfield for PM
User avatar
Honeybee
Member
Member
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 5:07 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: Cactus Standards Midnight
Decks Owned: 200
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2727 times
Been thanked: 819 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Honeybee »

Watching the youtube clips on how USPCC make their cards. I have changed my mind about it being the opacity as I figure everybody probably uses black glue to join the front and back sheets of paper and you would not be able to see through black glue and have the Back paper sheet showing through

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QoNFN9ZZfE

So I looked at my Wylenti again and noticed you can actually feel the pattern coming through from the other side.
It has to be the way the foil is applied to the back - I hope Omar, Lotrek or any of our tech savvy members can explain it for us.
It has not bled or suffered from a lack of opacity - it has been stamped/imprinted from the back

Add to this the fact that the other non foil editions of Tale of the Tempest do not have the problem, it is clearly a foiling application problem

No doubt some of you already knew this - it is just that I was not comfortable with the term 'bleeding' being used because that is not what is happening IMO

I have not seen the Royal Silk deck so I cannot be sure it is the same as the Wylenti problem. Another possibility is Ink Set-Off: Ink that is unintentionally transferred from a printed sheet to the back of the sheet above it when the materials have been printed and are stacked in a pile. I somehow doubt the Royal Silk problem could be such an ink problem knowing Lotrek's high standards

ps This and the previous post are here because of the discussion about the Royal Silk 'bleeding' but if a Mod would like to move these 2 posts to The Tale of the Tempest thread or the Technical Reference section of the forum, they may be better placed there.
Attachments
Bicycle use black glue.png
KoD - my initials, no wonder I grew up a lover of playing cards
Avatar - Honeybee (No.15+17) Tuck pic by Randy Butterfield for PM
User avatar
Bradius
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5680
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:56 am
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
White Whale: I do not hunt whales
Decks Owned: 4129
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 3169 times
Been thanked: 3288 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Bradius »

I am really not worried about bleeding to the face side of the cards as those are what you as a player are looking at. If it bleads to the back, then that makes marked cards and can be a huge problem if using them in a game. Of course, noticeable bleeding to the face does detract from the beauty of the cards, which is an issue with collector of playing card art. I guess on my higher value cards, this is an issue. However, I take into account the complexity of the manufacturing process. This is just an issue with foiling that I deal with as I would rather have these nice hot foils rather than standard or metalic printing. I guess it is up to everyone to decide.

For $6 a deck though, this deck was a STEAL. I wish I had bought more at the time.....
The Crazy Squirrel Deck Hunter - Hunt decks to extinction
User avatar
GandalfPC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4702
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 12:01 pm
Cardist: Yes
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Magician: Yes
White Whale: Ambergris
Decks Owned: 1700
Location: New Mexico
Has thanked: 7539 times
Been thanked: 4375 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by GandalfPC »

Yup - as the foils are put on with plates they can impress to the back.

With collector cards I would rather they mark the backs, otherwise the faces - and indeed, a half brick of Wylenti was hardly enough…
Hunting Karl Gerich and Elaine Lewis

My collection and tradelist: http://gandalfpc.great-site.net
User avatar
Honeybee
Member
Member
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 5:07 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: Cactus Standards Midnight
Decks Owned: 200
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2727 times
Been thanked: 819 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Honeybee »

I take your points Bradius but the nerdy purpose of my posts is to find a correct term for what is happening here - it is not bleeding by definition
Maybe working from Gandalf's post it could be termed 'pressed through' :?:
KoD - my initials, no wonder I grew up a lover of playing cards
Avatar - Honeybee (No.15+17) Tuck pic by Randy Butterfield for PM
User avatar
acetofive
Member
Member
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed May 20, 2020 12:03 am
Has thanked: 812 times
Been thanked: 764 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by acetofive »

I believe the effect shown on the reverse of a print when discussing debossing, embossing, or the transparency of the material is "show through." When discussing photographic prints with gallery owners, museums, etc., that's what we called it.
User avatar
GandalfPC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4702
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 12:01 pm
Cardist: Yes
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Magician: Yes
White Whale: Ambergris
Decks Owned: 1700
Location: New Mexico
Has thanked: 7539 times
Been thanked: 4375 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by GandalfPC »

I would concur - “show through” was the best result of an internet foray I did earlier today
Hunting Karl Gerich and Elaine Lewis

My collection and tradelist: http://gandalfpc.great-site.net
User avatar
Honeybee
Member
Member
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 5:07 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: Cactus Standards Midnight
Decks Owned: 200
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2727 times
Been thanked: 819 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Honeybee »

Thanks men - "Show Through" seems the perfect descriptor
The glossary of print terms I was looking at only defined 100 terms and did not have that one
KoD - my initials, no wonder I grew up a lover of playing cards
Avatar - Honeybee (No.15+17) Tuck pic by Randy Butterfield for PM
User avatar
GandalfPC
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4702
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 12:01 pm
Cardist: Yes
Collector: Yes
Player: Yes
Magician: Yes
White Whale: Ambergris
Decks Owned: 1700
Location: New Mexico
Has thanked: 7539 times
Been thanked: 4375 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by GandalfPC »

I believe the Oni are usually responsible for this type of printing issue. “They are fierce demons who cause misfortune, spread illness, and torment the damned in hell.”

IMG_7863.jpeg
IMG_7863.jpeg (259.22 KiB) Viewed 38809 times

This particular one, in monks clothing with one horn broken is a particular representation “Oni no kannebutsu”, discussed here: https://yokai.com/oninokannebutsu/

“The painting is a satire of monks and priests who dress and act pious, but who actually behave in a manner more fitting an oni than a buddha. This kind of comical depiction of religious hypocrisy is a theme frequently found in yōkai art.

There is a hidden message in oni no kannebutsu. One of the oni’s horns is broken. In other words, this oni may be trying to break out of its self-delusion. The broken horn shows that it has succeeded to some degree, serving as a role model and a reminder for viewers to do the same. So on one level, the image is a caricature of religious hypocrisy, but on another level, it can be seen as a reminder of the path to salvation.”


brought to you by “The More You Know” Yokai edition
Hunting Karl Gerich and Elaine Lewis

My collection and tradelist: http://gandalfpc.great-site.net
User avatar
TheGentlemanWake
✔ VERIFIED Designer
✔ VERIFIED Designer
Posts: 1604
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2018 8:03 pm
Collector: Yes
Decks Owned: 1000
Has thanked: 150 times
Been thanked: 2240 times
Contact:

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by TheGentlemanWake »

I’d call it over-stamping or over imprint. Or residual imprint. It’s just an artifact of the foiling process. Specifically the marking of the paper from the pressure and heat applied by the press when stamping the foil plate onto the paper.
For the best in playing cards related content:

https://www.wake.video/youtube
User avatar
Honeybee
Member
Member
Posts: 1817
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 5:07 am
Collector: Yes
White Whale: Cactus Standards Midnight
Decks Owned: 200
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 2727 times
Been thanked: 819 times

Re: [Shade] A little of this & a whole lot of that

Unread post by Honeybee »

Thanks Omar. Because of the cause I think 'Residual Imprint' is an excellent term for it.
KoD - my initials, no wonder I grew up a lover of playing cards
Avatar - Honeybee (No.15+17) Tuck pic by Randy Butterfield for PM
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest