It definitely looks like an Instagram post to me. I won't speak for shiroo56 but I think he's only being about 50% serious and that's not his content he shared.TwoPiece wrote:Who posted that, and on what platform? I will go out of my way to berate that person for being a little b^&*h.
Simple s&*tty designs merit criticism for the most simple "design change" of modifying a base color. It's the laziest s&*t you can do to an already lazy, garbage, design.
You wanna design a piece of s&*t? Go ahead? You wanna recolor it and advertise it? F&*k off.
I find the "mediocre-to-poor taste" comment quite hilarious, considering the deck is the literal "basic bitch" of playing cards. May wanna take a look in the mirror and realize that you lack any "taste" at all (whoever the loser OP is of that graphic).
Not every deck deserves a damn participation medal, either. "It's designed for yadda yadda yadda" my ass. That type of commentary is for losers who think "everyone can get along". News flash: We can't. Personalities clash, and there are people who literally disagree about everything. I could take a dump on a sheet of card stock and that would be more effort put into the design than this crap.
Edit* I don't know how to tag members on UC yet...