![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/494/088/afc2bc9fc0ce5335b7f7a13866333e00_large.jpg?1365144534)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/493/846/1384a56d48a3395b094b516dc252451f_large.jpg?1365136000)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/464/159/0c5fbd4de165af5c2b32258c60829464_large.jpg?1363996423)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/464/161/1d39263d80a6dd3fad69a277db17069d_large.jpg?1363996462)
![Image](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ksr/assets/000/464/169/af1d91fd4d1e5d98482850bf0cab7375_large.jpg?1363996657)
agreed. Consistency people.What I don't like is when the face borders don't match back borders.
Yes, there is clearly a strong trend of "obviously digital illustration" these days. Seems like most of the KS decks are following this mold.vasta41 wrote: I think I'm just getting a little sick of these computer animated designs
This one doesn't scream "gift shop" nearly as much as that Bicycle Majestic deck (IMO), but I do agree.Encarded wrote:Yes, there is clearly a strong trend of "obviously digital illustration" these days. Seems like most of the KS decks are following this mold.vasta41 wrote: I think I'm just getting a little sick of these computer animated designs
I never think of this kind of deck as "playing cards" but more of a picture book that just happens to have some pips thrown on it. It's totally my personal bias, I'll admit, but I mentally lump this kind of look with the collector decks from tourist gift shops that have some picture of dolphins on the back.
Encarded wrote:This deck is definitely far superior to a "gift shop" deck, I didn't mean to imply it was that bad. This one is pretty nice on the whole.
But in my own mind I tend to classify decks differently than most people I guess, into "designed" and "illustrated" and I perceive those very differently. This one is illustrated and to me more akin to the decks that have photos, as the "strength" of the deck relies far more on the illustration and less on the actual design, composition, balance, details, etc. I only have a couple "illustrated" decks, most notably the Blue Bloods but those have the artwork so carefully and thoroughly integrated that they appear to be a more cohesively designed package.
Sorry for the tangent, but it is always interesting to see and hear the perspectives of how people perceive creative projects.
I have to disagree with both Paul and Randy here. What I think matters the most is how the finished product looks. I really don't care if it is hand drawn or an image generated by a computer program. To me it is the same thing the designers are doing by using kickstarter. They are using their god given artistic ability, which I lack, to create a deck and stick it on Kickstarter. They are risking nothing but their time and if it doesn't work out, they are out nothing. If I want to do a deck, I have to pay someone to create the deck and take the risk. If the deck doesn't do well, I will be out money. Even if I put it on Kickstarter, I am still out the design fees.RandyButterfield wrote:Encarded wrote:This deck is definitely far superior to a "gift shop" deck, I didn't mean to imply it was that bad. This one is pretty nice on the whole.
But in my own mind I tend to classify decks differently than most people I guess, into "designed" and "illustrated" and I perceive those very differently. This one is illustrated and to me more akin to the decks that have photos, as the "strength" of the deck relies far more on the illustration and less on the actual design, composition, balance, details, etc. I only have a couple "illustrated" decks, most notably the Blue Bloods but those have the artwork so carefully and thoroughly integrated that they appear to be a more cohesively designed package.
Sorry for the tangent, but it is always interesting to see and hear the perspectives of how people perceive creative projects.
I feel the same way with the "designed" vs. "illustrated" Decks. A lot of the Deviant Art decks fall into the "illustrated" category. They're great to look at but not great for using in an actual card game. The Federal 52 Deck is a great example of a Deck that is illustrated AND designed exceptionally well.
Finding PIP placements and a uniform look that works consistently for 50+ face cards is not always an easy thing to do!
thanks, Randy
A lot of people are not going to have yours or Paul's artistic ability, you guys are amazing!!! For the artistically challenged, like myself, this is probably the only way we can somewhat level the playing field. We still are going to lose, it just won't be 92 - 0!!!RandyButterfield wrote:I was actually referencing the Deviant Art designs as mostly "illustrative" as opposed to "designed". I think the Voyager Deck has a nice balance that definitely makes it a playable design. The coloring has somewhat of a Photoshop airbrush look to it that gives it the "digital" vibe I think Paul is referring to. I''ll pledge for it sometime this week.
Thanks, Randy
I was one of those who dropped out. Unfortunately you are a side effect of the recent spate of of projects that are not fulfilling and I have decided to no longer do any KS decks.The Other Look wrote:Hello everyone, just wanted to say hi. My name is Bill Collins the creator of Bicycle Voyager deck. I have read most of everyone post about the deck, and would like to thank you for the good words. It seems as if I might not make the goal, perhaps it is do to no add-on's (coins, tokens, etc). I know things change in people's personal life and might need to drop there pledge, but that is the biggest challenge I have right now, I would be so close to the goal if not so many people dropped out.
The Other Look wrote:As my project “Voyager” falls on it's last days it appears as if it will not reach it's funding. If and when (and that’s a big IF) I ever try to fund this project again, what would be some suggestions that I might want to do differently. I am not a big fan of add-on's, but I might want to rethink that.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], crhage, Evilgamer, kevork, manu, rousselle, Sir Toddalot and 24 guests