![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
I was able to go for a mini box, but wanted an Oblivion Box, but they were already sold out. Yeah, thanks Gio. Lock me out...again.
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
I just think there is generally a poor grasp of what it takes to run a company making playing cards in 2022. People see the inflated KS numbers and thing 'OH WOW, that guy/gal made bank!" without really understanding what goes into it.STLBluesNut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:07 pm deck with plain glossy tuck $10
deck with upgraded tuck- foil embossing matte stock $15
deck with foil on one side of the cards and upgraded tuck $17 to $20
deck with foil on both sides of cards and upgraded tuck up to $25
any of the decks above with gilding +$5 to $10
I would have expected Kickstarter itself to be higher, and BackerKit to be lowerTheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:40 pmLet's not forget that KS takes 5% of your funding. Stripe takes another 5% for processing your funds. Backerkit takes 5% for handling your surveys
The ACTUAL number can vary a bit. Backerkit has multiple plans. Some require 3% but then have a per backer cost associated etc. For ease of my explanation I went with the blanket rate of 5%, which makes sense in larger campaigns.hsbc wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:31 pmI would have expected Kickstarter itself to be higher, and BackerKit to be lowerTheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:40 pmLet's not forget that KS takes 5% of your funding. Stripe takes another 5% for processing your funds. Backerkit takes 5% for handling your surveys
Jesus H. Christ; I got high blood pressure and an ulcer just from reading that!TheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:40 pm I just think there is generally a poor grasp of what it takes to run a company making playing cards in 2022. People see the inflated KS numbers and thing 'OH WOW, that guy/gal made bank!" without really understanding what goes into it.
$15 for a premium deck with 'upgraded' tuck... This would be a quick way to go out of business.
Let me walk you through this... [...]
Expect prices to go upSTLBluesNut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:07 pmthese are probably prices from when i started collecting over 3 years ago. this is what i have been used to.
Haha, yeah... I remember way before Parlour when I met with Asad Chaudry post his mega-successful Mint 2 campaign. I said "500k! You are set!" and you know what he did? He didn't look excited or happy or relieved. He politely smiled and said 'sure' in as earnest a delivery he could muster--so I was sure he meant no sarcasm. At the time I chalked it up to humility. Looking back on it, sure production prices at that time weren't as crazy as they are now, but there were a lot of bells and whistles to that campaign. He gifted a gaff pack to large orders and there were some metalluxe decks too. He must have had serious production costs. He printed a lot of decks with 5000+ backers. I bet he printed north of 40k decks. Thats a BIG order by custom standards. Chris Ramsay probably prints 50k each run of 1st decks. Both those numbers track, since at the time Assad had about 1mil subs on youtube. Although I bet Ramsay now surpasses that. Anyway, my point is there was probably a lot of stress and exhaustion and turmoil in what I interpreted as 'humility'. Probably a little bit of "i didn't win the lottery, this was hard work!" lolTimmargh wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:34 pmJesus H. Christ; I got high blood pressure and an ulcer just from reading that!TheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:40 pm I just think there is generally a poor grasp of what it takes to run a company making playing cards in 2022. People see the inflated KS numbers and thing 'OH WOW, that guy/gal made bank!" without really understanding what goes into it.
$15 for a premium deck with 'upgraded' tuck... This would be a quick way to go out of business.
Let me walk you through this... [...]
dammit i did a big post that did not show up lol. let me try to recreate.TheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 4:40 pm . How many decks are you printing? The cost per deck SKY rockets depending on how little you print. Wanna know why 'LIMITED' decks are so expensive? It's not because of false scarcity. It LITERALLY costs more to print less decks. How much? I can tell you from personal experience that it can be as much as $10-$15 a deck DIFFERANCE on top of the standard costs. You read that right.
Definitely with your campaigns we are not getting just decks of cards we are getting an awesome story and that takes your time which also 'costs' money.Thirdway Industries wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:59 pm Hehe prices are always an hot topic
There are many factors, and I can confirm all that Omar said.
However, even if generally speaking prices are going up, I am trying to release also unexpensive decks (some "Egoist" Patrons can confirm) and I am trying to keep "expensive" decks reasonable at launch.
As said before, Memoria decks have the same (or probably even more) features than Apocalisse and Apoteosi, but are cheaper.
I could say that 2022 TWI prices were lower than 2021, and I don't think to raise them during the next months.
Anyways, prices apart, I hope you're enjoying the campaign and the story - I really had fun with this one.
A huge thank you to everyone got these during the very first hours - I am very grateful![]()
Yes and no. Let me explain--i wasn't clear. Printing less decks IS more expensive. For argument sake let's say printing 100 decks costs $2000. That's $20 a deck. Well, the printers (like Cartamundi for instance) are very shrewd and tactful. They want to incentivize you to print more because the more you print the more money they make. THIS Is ABSOLUTELY TRUE. But they don't want to charge you $1 or $2 a deck. They want to maximize profits. How do they do that? By reducing the cost per deck to $10 but only if you buy 1000. Again these numbers are just placeholder examples--the actual quotes are more specific. So you get 50% discount but you have to order 500% more decks. Your $2000 deal is now $10,000. This is NOT cheaper than spending $2000. The one obvious advantage is you can charge a lower price and now make twice as much profit per deck which in the end works out in your favor. But 1000 decks is LOT harder to sell than 100. Even with a cheaper price. Let's agree that it may in fact be easier to get 100 people to spend $20 than it is to get 1000 to spend $10.STLBluesNut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:52 pm so you are agreeing that making a lower number of decks costs more. that much is kind of common sense. the creator is making a choice to print less than the standard run or is choosing to print less decks. this isnt really a limited resource, you can print as many as you like. it isn't like you are a grower of prized peaches and your limited land and trees actually limits the number that can be grown and sold. this makes them more rare artificially, by choice, for whatever reason. this lower print run makes them cost more. therefore, artificially limiting the run causes the price of decks to go up. so yes, artificial rarity and false scarcity increases the price and makes them more expensive. whether they decide to charge even more for the 'rarity' above and beyond just the increase in cost is up to them and i submit many do.
I hope it can be MORE features than Apocalisse and Apoteosi, so those two decks and these new decks stand out for themselves. Your decks series are easily distinguished, not just from artwork, but from the finishes on the cards and tuckbox.Thirdway Industries wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:59 pm As said before, Memoria decks have the same (or probably even more) features than Apocalisse and Apoteosi, but are cheaper.
agreed, partially. i can see this being a valid argument when applied to demand. if you are a newer creator, or maybe a less popular creator, who averages selling say 300 decks, i will concede buying 1000 at a higher overall cost to get a bulk discount wouldn't be prudent. printing only 300 decks wouldn't be for the purpose of making them rare, it is just responsibly buying what you expect to be sold. just as the corner gas station buys a small amount of milk because that is what they sell. they would lose money buying it cheaper per gallon by the pallet. however, if you were a creator with a history or knowing that a deck is going to be in higher demand and then you choose to make less than what demand will be in order to call it limited, knowingly raise your cost for the deck and knowingly produce less than what your supporters would buy to raise demand and the price, i think that is kind of crummy. just like walmart doesn't buy one case of milk and then charge triple for it on a first come, first served basis. i think this is where we may ultimately disagree, you see it as building exclusivity, demand and luxury into your brand, i see it as pissing off your loyal fans by either pricing them out of a deck or making some of them miss it because they weren't fast enough to get one or weren't able to be at the sale in that small window. you MAY make a little more by selling less for more but the big winners in that are the bot resellers, gouging the aftermarket and the big losers are your fans. without seeing real numbers, i still contend you would make more on high demand decks by selling more for less.TheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:17 pm Let's agree that it may in fact be easier to get 100 people to spend $20 than it is to get 1000 to spend $10.
less than i think is still artificial. the amount of artificiality was never my contention and in some cases, there is a lot of it. and a lot of price hiking. see $250 cherry casinos and $300 bicycle NFT deck (although this is probably more likely just a sh!%%y practice of walling the deck behind buying an NFT which actually may have been costly to mint in order to sell NFT's) and many more.
in this case, if i am to understand correctly, your website is the only outlet (not including scalpers on Ebay) to buy the black deck? if this is the case then this is a poor example. of course you are going to see more sales of it because you are the only place that has a reasonable price. they aren't scarce in quantity, you're just the only outlet. although, i think you may have hit it on the head somewhat with that being a more popular color and being numbered, another thing i really could care less about but the lemmings just jump off the cliff for.TheGentlemanWake wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:17 pm But the real reason? Is because you can't find them anywhere else. SCARCITY creates demand. Eventhough out there is the EXACT same number of Black decks as there are Blue or Red ones, the simple fact that more people bought them (for whatever reason; maybe they liked the color more or the gold foil or because they were numbered) the black Parlour is much more sought after.
I do think this is true. Which is why I try hard to not make my decks mere recolors/tuck swaps, etc. I try hard to make sure each deck has a reason for being. We're taking a step further with successor by adding additional features and even having a second back design for the Dynastinae and Prism variants.STLBluesNut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:04 pm
i know you have said that we, on the UC forum, are but a small amount of the community and customers but i am sure you have seen the numerous posts in numerous threads of more and more people not willing to buy into hype and pay over inflated prices for decks. i think it would be a mistake to think that only the people posting here are feeling that way. people are getting fed up with recolors, tuck swaps, just gilding the same cards that are in other offered decks. You asked for prices above and i was the only to answer. i understand that you truly know the cost of the items but that is, albeit one, a consumers perspective on price expectations. i assume other are probably more forgiving than i am but at some point, no matter what the cost was to produce it, some number of people are just not going to buy it because the price is unreasonable, from a consumer standpoint. perhaps i have misread and i am alone on these points but i don't think i am.
I really appreciate the discourse too. ANd I certainly learn from our and from other discussions. Thank you for that.anywho, i do really appreciate the open dialogue and sharing of perspective with you, Omar. thank you. i really do think the creators/designers that come here and engage with us, have better care and understanding for their customers.
I think it is MORE to "Vote with your Heart" - you just need to like the thing in order to buy. Though heart is a fickle thing - you might say: Ugh I don't think I like the design, but then money comes in and say - GET IT! It would worth a lot in few years time. Sadly, the other way around is also a heartbreaking: Heart says want, but Money says NoBradius wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:35 pm I wrote a long response. My main point though is to "Vote with your wallet". A better way to say it (and means really the same thing) "Buy what you like". It may mean that you like the deck(s), but not at the price point being sold. In the end, it comes down to the same thing. For whatever reason you like or dislike the package, vote with your money.
I am not planning to use BackerKit on Memoria!portcullis wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 7:50 am Hmm, I may have to split this given I only get 1 pay between now and the end of the campaign (naughty Gio!) That of course assumes the gilded pair will be available later. Or do I back the gilded pair now and bakerkit the standard pair?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], kevork and 7 guests