data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6c69/c6c69710357a01910029721327b82750ccd36beb" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f68e8/f68e88673135bd9661c4510e6e0de1d52ab37780" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/321c1/321c1a34be0e0eab83990cd3fdee6cc7a8c01673" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/516b4/516b4c2b6709c010ea5c17f1b1dc3dc78fe3a539" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4c9a/c4c9a864e62184564abb4306da6fa8a74d3243d2" alt="Image"
I agree about the tuck. Truly the weakest point of the deck. It needs to stand out more IMO. But I disagree about the backs. They should not be full-bleed so that the front and back borders match in color.Harvonsgard wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:19 am Those colours are flashy; I like that. Nice borderless back design is a plus in my book as well.
Courts are fun and I really like what the designer has done with the AoD. Well done deck. Tuck is a bit... some texture would have been splendid but I'm okay with it if the price is good.
No diversity? Water sports, winter sports, aerial activities, ... every court card depicts even two different activities. Looks like a lot of diversity for me.
My experiences with WJPC decks and your experiences with them are likely very different things. It may feel like I am bias about them in a negative way and I possibly am at this point, however that's earned by my experiences with the things and the cost. I like good value for money like everyone else. If I'm shelling out a premium price for a deck of cards, I want to know what I'm getting myself into. I'm much more likely to pick up NPCC decks than I am WJPC decks. I know what I'm getting with NPCC, they're consistent, have great tucks and usually the art is pretty impressive too.Fud wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 12:20 am ** About the WJPC printing stigma; as a creator I would genuinely like to know specifically what it is that is objectionable about the printer. I get pushback on every deck which I print from this community, but mostly it is vague ‘quality’ concerns, nothing concrete that I can specifically resolve or evaluate. I’m not being defensive at all and have no problem with negative feedback; I just want to know what needs to be changed to improve in your eyes. I *think* I know, but I don't want to put words into mouths and make assumptions - give it to me straight.
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
Thanks for taking the time to write that post, it was really helpful! I understand where your coming from, and for the 2 examples you references (Elephant and Cyberpunk); the early print runs were rubbish. The Elephant in particular was so clumpy I couldn't believe it. However, subsequent print runs have been a LOT smoother and more consistent (really, ask anyone who got a Circuit deck, or an EPC deck printed within the last year).
I hope that's a good damn, but I'm never 100% sure
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
Fun video, thanks for posting it here.
As far as Home Run Games is concerned, I wonder if you are confusing WJPC with The Freedom Playing Card Company. Home Run Games has printed most of their reproduction decks with USPCC, but they have used The Freedom Playing Card Company for several more recent decks.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Leachy19, Petkoski and 51 guests