![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Crying or Very Sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Ugly King :ugking:](./images/smilies/icon_uglymadking.gif)
I am weary of this funding.. but there's still hope. Make sure to ask everyone you know to cross promote (I haven't seen JR here in a while but his fan base could certainly help). Also, I'm not sure if this would help, but it takes a double-take to realize that your KS title is actually playing cards. Maybe add the word "deck" or "decks" in there for keyword purposes? I'm not sure how KS searches go but you could get more hits that way.Jocu wrote:Outsider wrote:Actually with a bit under €700 a day average on top of what you've already raised, you'll hit the 250% funding goal. You received over €1000 on day 2 of funding, so you're perfectly on track so far.Jocu wrote:Eh it feels like it’s stalled massively today. Only moved a couple of percent since this morning. Still in good shape but you start to wonder where the rest of the backers will come from
Well when you put it like that... I guess it’s only been a day and a half so there’s loads of time left. Maybe it’s time to sit back a bit and see what happens for the next couple of days.
Definetly. Take some rest, and relax a bit. There is no way, this will not get funded! Just as others said, the quality of this campaign is clearly visible.Jocu wrote:Maybe it’s time to sit back a bit and see what happens for the next couple of days.
aardvarkgod wrote:You could always post an update staging a fake war with UC at the last minute to boost sales...that seems to work for some campaigns. [BACON]
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
As much as I laughed at your post (way tooooooo muchaardvarkgod wrote:You could always post an update staging a fake war with UC at the last minute to boost sales...that seems to work for some campaigns. [BACON]
aardvarkgod wrote:...some campaigns. [BACON]
Agreed. We don't want him coming back here...shiroo56 wrote:As much as I laughed at your post (way tooooooo muchaardvarkgod wrote:You could always post an update staging a fake war with UC at the last minute to boost sales...that seems to work for some campaigns. [BACON]![]()
) - please let that topic die ...
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
On it now! Google Analytics confirms that 60-90% of users are on smartphones seeing tiny dots. The mockups are nice, but they just aren't getting seen. Lesson learned.montenzi wrote:This campaign should be ok. Look at NEO:WAVE Kicktrack It was a classic example how not to start a campaignwith just 40% after first three days. LOL.
p.s. Try to make images bigger (boxes, back design). The art is detailed, but I cannot see anything.
I don't know why the start was slow.Jocu wrote:Interesting about your NEO:WAVE campaign, what caused the slow start? And what do you think contributed to it's eventual success?
Thank you my friend!Decknowledgy wrote:Just changed my pledge to The Gambler and added an additional two decks, hope this helps!
Are you going to have a deal for a single brick?Jocu wrote:Thank you my friend!Decknowledgy wrote:Just changed my pledge to The Gambler and added an additional two decks, hope this helps!
A few people have upped their pledges and made today quit a success. We’re almost at 70%!
I’ve reintroduced the ‘brick of each’ tier for €195 on a 28 hour limited reward for the weekend. It’ll likely be the cheapest opportunity to get some decks so if anyone likes to buy by the brick check it out.
That said you’ve all been wonderful and I can’t ask any more of anyone here. Hopefully it will tempt some new backers
chicken_ql wrote:Are you going to have a deal for a single brick?Jocu wrote:Thank you my friend!Decknowledgy wrote:Just changed my pledge to The Gambler and added an additional two decks, hope this helps!
A few people have upped their pledges and made today quit a success. We’re almost at 70%!
I’ve reintroduced the ‘brick of each’ tier for €195 on a 28 hour limited reward for the weekend. It’ll likely be the cheapest opportunity to get some decks so if anyone likes to buy by the brick check it out.
That said you’ve all been wonderful and I can’t ask any more of anyone here. Hopefully it will tempt some new backers
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
Thank you! I’m looking forward to itTheGentlemanWake wrote:We'll be shouting Fillide out on the next Parlour update! Hope to see this get funded!
I wonder, and forgive me for offering my opinion, could the name be hurting your project? I don't of course know what Fillide means inherently. But I think there's a dramatic undervaluing of what a deck is NAMED. I actually have a similar thought regarding Jody's Luminosity. I wonder if something else more norse in nature would have attracted even more funding. Again, prior to Parlour, this kind of comment from me is par for the course--I'm a reviewer after all. I certainly don't want to come across as feeling like I know better. lol. Lorenzo and I deliberated about a month on what to call the deck, as obvious as the deck name seems now. SO I know its hard to do.
Most definitely!Jocu wrote:Thank you! I’m looking forward to itTheGentlemanWake wrote:We'll be shouting Fillide out on the next Parlour update! Hope to see this get funded!
I wonder, and forgive me for offering my opinion, could the name be hurting your project? I don't of course know what Fillide means inherently. But I think there's a dramatic undervaluing of what a deck is NAMED. I actually have a similar thought regarding Jody's Luminosity. I wonder if something else more norse in nature would have attracted even more funding. Again, prior to Parlour, this kind of comment from me is par for the course--I'm a reviewer after all. I certainly don't want to come across as feeling like I know better. lol. Lorenzo and I deliberated about a month on what to call the deck, as obvious as the deck name seems now. SO I know its hard to do.
It’s a good theory and something we haven’t considered. It’s not got the nicest ring in English however you pronounce it. On the other hand it’s the only Italian on the box and I originally wanted a bit more. Also in general having a name that people are unsure of how to pronounce is fishy. Worth bearing in mind for next time!
But then again we can’t complain with 75% funding after 4 days. We didn’t even have an online presence six months ago so it’s not all doom and gloom
It allows us to keep shipping free regardless of addons or choice of decks.Smocito wrote:"No add-ons available at this tier"
I don't think this helps...
What does this mean exactly?
These pledges can't get absolutely no add-ons? Or just no add-ons at the discounted price higher pledges have?
It's been a massive help! We'll know the full results tomorrowMagic Tapp wrote:Steady does it. You are at 85 per cent. and it looks like TGW’s shoutout is also helping. Well done.
Users browsing this forum: Disenchanted_11 and 13 guests