KILL THE CONTEST!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1cc/5e1cc879f550fb3fc7510e8311735ca788fc474b" alt="Laughing :lol:"
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
Can't argue with that. Might as well just give Best Foil to Lotrek right away.STLBluesNut wrote:I vote best pips as we already know who wins best foil.
I hear what you are saying but am not sure this would be so one-sided. Neo Wave and HotRS are very impressive.MagikFingerz wrote:Can't argue with that. Might as well just give Best Foil to Lotrek right away.STLBluesNut wrote:I vote best pips as we already know who wins best foil.
It would certainly count for consideration as Best Innovation.STLBluesNut wrote:Next year, does the VXD holographic foil count as foil? I know it is labeled as foil, but it seems like some sort of clear holographic coating, perhaps applied or stamped like a foil. Can a true metal foil really be clear?
yea, as the great Eleanor Roosevelt said; "You'll be damned if you do, damned if you don't." *sigh*TwoPiece wrote:You can't make everyone HAPPY, but you may be able to make everyone UNHAPPY...
KILL THE CONTEST!![]()
I see. While this makes sense, what I had in mind was coming from a central location or pool for some reason. Like the donators would send them to a common person to handle shipping out. That doesn't make much sense for shipping reasons. My misunderstanding.JuFiN wrote: As for splitting up the prizes I think you might be misunderstanding how prizes are given, the decks I am offering will be sent direct from me to the person
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
PipChick wrote:I decided to postpone to allow for extra time to members who frequent UC more during the weekend, but "Nominations thread" will be opened later today when I get home from work - ya'll have been notified lol
NOOOO, haha - definitely not lol - It's actually all the other mods that have helped me lol. Besides, I do this because I want to and hope that it encourages others to also wanna contribute in whatever small ways they can to this already amazing communityEric Lee wrote:PipChick wrote:I decided to postpone to allow for extra time to members who frequent UC more during the weekend, but "Nominations thread" will be opened later today when I get home from work - ya'll have been notified lol
You know, for all your hard work here, you deserve a honorary award like Best new Mod of the year! Mike? Any mods to help back me up here?![]()
Cocaine is a hell of a drug...Eric Lee wrote:PipChick wrote:I decided to postpone to allow for extra time to members who frequent UC more during the weekend, but "Nominations thread" will be opened later today when I get home from work - ya'll have been notified lol
You know, for all your hard work here, you deserve a honorary award like Best new Mod of the year! Mike? Any mods to help back me up here?![]()
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
Awww shucks - that's super flattering but no lol. Besides, the whole point of going through all this effort was with the objective in mind to to narrow down & reduce the total number of award categories, NOT to be adding to them!! C'mon guys! STAY FOCUSED!!MagikFingerz wrote:I agree with Amy.
Buuuuut, I also think she deserves an award
The Party of PipChick supports this candidate... but only if you run under the platform of "Make Posts Crap Again" lmaoTwoPiece wrote:TwoPiece for Mod 2019.
My parents will endorse me.
Make your nightmare a reality!
Well, it seemed like a common reason people expressed for not voting last year or only partially voting was because choosing decks for each category (some of which not everyone is really familiar with) from literally hundreds of qualifying decks to have been released this past year was overwhelming & intimidating, especially for new members who perhaps haven't been in the hobby for very long and therefore aren't even aware of all the decks to have come out in the time prior to joining the hobby - this way, in the several weeks leading up to the big vote, any member can nominate any number of decks for whichever categories they think should be up for consideration. Ultimately, this will narrow down the number of choices so when voting does come around, there will already be a handful of great possible candidates for each category from which they can choose from. But don't be mistaken; this does not eliminate the option to write in any other deck that wasn't explicitly nominated by another member prior to voting - so really, there shouldn't be any concern that you can't vote for literally any deck you'd want to anyways.sinjin7 wrote:When was it decided that we would do nominations instead of open voting? Part of the reason why we wanted to reduce categories is so that we would encourage voting. Nominations just adds an additional step in a process that was already complicated and needed streamlining. Most importantly, if we limit the voting to nominated decks, then there will be some/many voters who wish to participate only to find out their favorite decks are not eligible to be voted on due to an arbitrary pre-nomination process.
Reducing categories to make the contest more user-friendly makes sense to increase participation and enjoyment of the contest. Adding another administrative process to the contest that serves to restrict your freedom to vote for the decks of your choice because some other people didn't deem your decks to be worthy of inclusion seem counter-intuitive to increasing participation and enjoyment of the contest.
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
oh no! looks like the query formula got goofed up - no worries; I'll take a look and fix it when I get a chance. In the meanwhile, just hold tightSTLBluesNut wrote:is anyone else not seeing any decks on the non-KS tab of PipChick's awesome deck list? Perhaps there aren't any in that section yet?
Users browsing this forum: gianluca1975, Google [Bot], kevork, RandyButterfield, tantairuoxi and 16 guests