


Name: No.7
Printer: Cartamundi (with foil on the cards)
Stock: Slimline B9
p.s. this post will be updated with the progress.


I completely agree with guru here, a premium tuck is a must for the this deck. I'm glad you're staying away from having a gold border. I quite like the current color scheme just fine, but I wonder if a darker blue background color would be more beneficial. Cold pressed foil lacks the "shine" that regular hot-stamped foiling has, so I think you'll have more contrast with a darker background to help the cold pressed foil pop a little more.guru wrote:One add-on that you can consider for this new deck is inner tuck printing or foil on a matte thick card stock for the tuckbox.
PS: I like the white border as compared to the golden one as well. Golden borders make me remember those cheap Chinese gold plated decks.
Yes the tuck must be premium. And there is no blue color on the back. It's green..almostsinjin7 wrote: I completely agree with guru here, a premium tuck is a must for the this deck. I'm glad you're staying away from having a gold border. I quite like the current color scheme just fine, but I wonder if a darker blue background color would be more beneficial. Cold pressed foil lacks the "shine" that regular hot-stamped foiling has, so I think you'll have more contrast with a darker background to help the cold pressed foil pop a little more.
Weve come full circle Bradius, your great grandmothers fasionable rug is back in season!Bradius wrote:The design is a little too antique for me at first observation (my great-grandmother's rug design is not a good thing in my mind). However, the cold foil effect will really take it to a new level that I will want to have anyway. The green background color seems a bit dark again at first look. Then again, the new Hudson deck back seems too washed out. Maybe I need my eyes checked. I do agree with you and others that white borders would do best for this deck. It definitely has a retro-holidays vibe for me, and white would look best. I am fine with gold borders. I am really looking forward to Lorenzo's Cartomancer deck that uses gold borders, and which fits his design perfectly. That said, you could go for a white/silver border to let that cold foil do it's thing.
can't wait! TBH I was able to see your decks in the Cartamundy factory, some time agomontenzi wrote: @Conturbia you'll have a chance!![]()
rousselle wrote:You are a fussy, picky guy.
Lotrek wrote:Given the number of morons produced in the world every day, a pessimist is actually a well informed realist.
Räpylätassu wrote:"Tyhmyydestä sakotetaan." You get fined for being stupid.
Love it! If all courts would be like that, I am definitely in.montenzi wrote:OokeyDon't like to post sketches
as my drawing skils ... are awful LOL
I draw like a kid![]()
In style? Not in style?
Agreed. Conceptually, that court looks great for this deckBradius wrote:You are off to a good start.
I'd buy a couple of those.montenzi wrote:OokeyDon't like to post sketches
as my drawing skils ... are awful LOL
I draw like a kid![]()
In style? Not in style?
HUGE Thank you for posting! For me, I'm always fascinated by the creative process that goes into developing what will eventually become the final work. Even just this one preliminary sketch gives us a small insight into the consilience of your vision for this deck, your artistic intuition in developing a cohesive aesthetic/style to that of the back design, and the technique you use at this stage to execute it all before editing & refining your craft - super interesting! please share more as you gomontenzi wrote:OokeyDon't like to post sketches
as my drawing skils ... are awful LOL
I draw like a kid![]()
In style? Not in style?
This ^^^rousselle wrote:I like the way you capture a very three-dimensional look with this sketch. The traditional courts favored by USPCC (and other traditional courts favored by Arrco and Hoyle and Gemaco, etc.) all have a court or two who appear to have their heads turned a little bit, but still look absolutely flat. Your management of line thickness suggests depth, which gives the face more expression. I like the direction you're taking here *a lot*.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], brownsl, felicityk, Google [Bot], Magisterrene and 16 guests