Hi guys,
Looking to chase some leads for a deck I purchased from a hotel in Hong Kong.
I can't seem to find any identical criteria either here or on Portfolio 52 etc. Of particular note is the dull copper colour dual border around the fairly standard red dotted border.
Can any Bee experts enlighten me please?
Bee No.92 Club Special - Back No 67?
- Thedissident001
- Member
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 12:19 am
- Collector: Yes
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Bee No.92 Club Special - Back No 67?
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2034.JPG (115.86 KiB) Viewed 1422 times
-
- IMG_2035.JPG (85 KiB) Viewed 1422 times
-
- IMG_2036.JPG (98.24 KiB) Viewed 1422 times
-
- IMG_2037.JPG (86.11 KiB) Viewed 1422 times
- Thedissident001
- Member
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 12:19 am
- Collector: Yes
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Bee No.92 Club Special - Back No 67?
More pics
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2038.JPG (196.73 KiB) Viewed 1421 times
-
- IMG_2039.JPG (115.56 KiB) Viewed 1421 times
-
- IMG_2040.JPG (118.08 KiB) Viewed 1421 times
-
- IMG_2041.JPG (144.12 KiB) Viewed 1421 times
-
- Deck Artist
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 3:43 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: Bee No.92 Club Special - Back No 67?
How is the feeling of cards? Smooth like as a standard Bee deck cards?
Date code is sixth week of 2015. But the date on red banded card is 11 February 2015, which it is the seventh week of 2015. It shows that there is a conflict with dates.
Date code is sixth week of 2015. But the date on red banded card is 11 February 2015, which it is the seventh week of 2015. It shows that there is a conflict with dates.
- Thedissident001
- Member
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 12:19 am
- Collector: Yes
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: Bee No.92 Club Special - Back No 67?
They are definitively smooth like a standard deck of Bee cards, no discernible difference.
Date difference is interesting, they were all part of the same cellophane sealed deck. Would some cards have been produced independent of the others perhaps?
Date difference is interesting, they were all part of the same cellophane sealed deck. Would some cards have been produced independent of the others perhaps?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests