Did the colors get reversed? Looking at the KS page, it looks like it's supposed to be a black tuck with silver/gray lettering. Even update #8 shows black tuck with silver/gray lettering:CBJ wrote:Pictures are starting to pop up on my Facebook feed. Decks are arriving in people's hands!
Cool. This actually makes me a little more excited to get these now!JacksonRobinson wrote:No the colors never changed. The specific picture you see above just has the black foil reflecting my softbox light just right so it looks like light grey. The design has always remained black tuck with black foil. Hope that clears that up.
Um... Anita Hill? Thomas Wolfe?MagikFingerz wrote:Didn't get these myself, but it's sad to see such poor registration (which isn't on the producer, but the manufacturer).
The USPCC just keeps shooting themselves in the foot with this, don't they? As the top playing card manufacturer they should really take measures to fix it, but I guess "the wolf on top of the hill is not as hungry as the wolf climbing the hill" (massive bonus points to whoever knows where the quote is from).
No. But I suppose I can't guarantee that it hasn't appeared more than one place.rousselle wrote:Um... Anita Hill? Thomas Wolfe?MagikFingerz wrote:Didn't get these myself, but it's sad to see such poor registration (which isn't on the producer, but the manufacturer).
The USPCC just keeps shooting themselves in the foot with this, don't they? As the top playing card manufacturer they should really take measures to fix it, but I guess "the wolf on top of the hill is not as hungry as the wolf climbing the hill" (massive bonus points to whoever knows where the quote is from).
Basically how the back design is centered on the back of the card...if you look at the picture that PrincessTrouble shows, the design is much closer to the side of the card than the other...in other words, poor registration, which is quite common with USPC decks...if you look at Legends and Expert decks, the registration is usually spot on (both sides have equal borders)ccralleo wrote:What do folks mean when they use the word registration?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Totally. Not faulting Jackson at all; it's USPCC. This is really my only gripe with them. But it's so bothersome to me that I'll cut way back on my USPCC purchases since they seem to be doing nothing to improve the issue. I'm always so relieved now when I see a deck design I like and the artist decides to go with Legends or Expert. I'd rather wait much longer for a deck with perfect registration to be produced and shipped on a slow boat than a USPCC deck with crappy registration that gets produced and shipped in a shorter time.MagikFingerz wrote:Didn't get these myself, but it's sad to see such poor registration (which isn't on the producer, but the manufacturer).
Cardians wrote:The box looks more brown then black.. Can you take a picture of the other side...
Thanks,
Nah, he just made a deal with him. Which means that Jackson Robinson is the devilshermjack wrote:Love the matching set Pierre! This proves that you are the DEVIL
Approx 3 1/4 in wide x 4 3/5 in high x 1 7/8 in deepBikefanatic wrote:How big is a Legacy case or something else that's comparable in size?
I agree 100%.Siege wrote:I was sad to hear that the KW King's head logo never worked out. It was the main aesthetic reason I backed. It's a significant design shift.
I received my Legcy yesterday and think the seal design is a nicer look. My first Legacy from KW and looking at the 3 Tally-Ho's in Pierre's picture having the black one say Tally-Ho would have looked better.Siege wrote:I was sad to hear that the KW King's head logo never worked out. It was the main aesthetic reason I backed. It's a significant design shift.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], brownsl, JazzBaloo, laitostarr777, Oneiros88 and 16 guests