Citizens from Theory 11

[Lotrek]

1. Courts
1. Back
1. Aces
1. Tuck

[Scrambled Decks]

Is it bad I'm a sucker for T11 since I sometimes buy just for the box?

[MagikFingerz]

1. Back
2. Courts
3. Aces
4. Tuck

Interesting how there's 4 different priority lists from 4 members. Perhaps the subject for a new topic in General?

[badpete69]

1. Courts
2. Tuck
3. Aces
4. Back

[farmisen]

1. Courts
2. Back
3. Tuck
4. Aces

[sinjin7]

Backs
Courts
Tuck
Aces

[vasta41]

So it seems like I'm the only one but since I don't open any of my decks anymore and I display them in my custom cases my order is:
1. Tuck
2. Everything else
Now if someone just pooped in a nice box that wouldn't mean I'd buy it but let's be honest- since I will probably never open it, what does it matter what's inside? But I guess it still does for some reason. There's something comforting about knowing good things lie inside. So if I ever were to open them I suppose the rest of my list would go:
2. Backs
3. Aces
4. Courts

p.s. I consider backs and tucks synonymous. If the back of a tuck isn't the same as the back of the cards I'm very rarely not upset.

[Talisman]

Backs
Courts
Tuck
Aces

+1 on that order.

[nECr0MaNCeD]

1. Courts
2. Tuck
3. Aces
4. Back

Same here. I'll also echo Vasta's comment about Tuck's and backs being equally important. For me Backs that are lackluster compared to the tuck is a big let down for me. Case in point. Medallions. The tuck is gorgeous and while the backs are pretty in their own right, pale in comparison.

[Talisman]

So it seems like I'm the only one but since I don't open any of my decks anymore and I display them in my custom cases my order is:
1. Tuck
2. Everything else
Now if someone just pooped in a nice box that wouldn't mean I'd buy it but let's be honest- since I will probably never open it, what does it matter what's inside? But I guess it still does for some reason. There's something comforting about knowing good things lie inside. So if I ever were to open them I suppose the rest of my list would go:
2. Backs
3. Aces
4. Courts

p.s. I consider backs and tucks synonymous. If the back of a tuck isn't the same as the back of the cards I'm very rarely not upset.

I saw this post after I posted before and I have to agree with Vasta also. I hardly ever open my decks, but knowing what's inside is just as important as well if I ever should decide to use them.

[Bikefanatic]

For those that don't open decks, I suppose you have another one of the same deck to use right?

[nECr0MaNCeD]

For those that don't open decks, I suppose you have another one of the same deck to use right?

For the most part. I have at least 2 of roughly 90% of my decks.

[shermjack]

Courts
Tuck
Back
Aces

[PrincessTrouble]

Backs
Courts
Tuck
Aces

[JofDiamonds]

Classic Courts?
- Back
- Tuck
- Courts
- Aces
Novel Courts?
- Courts
- Backs
- Tuck
- Aces