Ooh. Well, maybe I will get lucky: I pulled the trigger on AoP’s mystery uncut decks x2 last week, which is already in shipment... fingers crossed...

I do like this deck series and would likely buy at least a pair of these, but I’d hope to see at least a new joker design to seal it as something a bit more than *just* a recolor...

Sprung for a threesome. Gilt-edge edition to follow??

Just trying to understand the “matching numbering” commitment: if I’m in for, say, the 2x Gold & U/V Metal tier, and add on the other decks that aren’t part of the tier (like the Classic, and the non-metal Gold & U/V decks), will the numbers match across ALL of those decks, or only the decks...

At $20 shipped for a single early bird deck I can quite easily PASS

Bradius wrote:Personally, I just want anyone interested to pledge. I want to see this funded.

Seconded. But do feel free to PM me, anyone wanting to get 3 for 2 on this deck (and help me get 3 for 2 as well!)

EDIT: CLAIMED!

This is definitely overpriced imo. But still I have to have it for the tuck which I think is really great. So I am a crazed collector I guess. In for a pair.

RichK wrote:Again, no email.

Writing Lotrek now.

If you can’t get a reply I suggest sending the PayPal to him anyway — if you want the deck. PM for the addy if you need (I don’t know if it’s the same as his reg email)

Not good form to whine about one’s backers, not at all, but at least we get something at last. I hope the tale is true and we see actual decks some day rather than just words.

I hate to bring up delays, but I don't think the test decks that were purchased directly from your website as part of the Inverted Inferno campaign (Update #2) have ever been shipped. I know it isn't a huge order, but that is also getting a bit long on delays. Those were ordered in May of 2017. Any...

Damn. Now I don't know if the sounder choice for preserving trade value is to keep it in the plastic baggie or open it to check the contents. Double dangit. Having had this happen on an Oath Prototype, I now feel I’ve got to open these pristine decks. Ah, whatever. I’ll pop ‘em into a carat case. I...

I don't use poker chips but like the idea. I might make use of them somehow. I would spring for the chips if they’d have betting values on them. I understand not wanting the values on the face/reverse, given the design that’s been done. But surely values could be placed on the chip edges, as is ver...

I wonder if the Eclipse will ultimately have greater or fewer produced and sold than Sol & Mani.

I’m wrong about the quantity, cabinets were available to add on. And yet.

“Designed to "magically stack" with other cabinets in your collection” “The whole idea behind having multiple cabinets is that they magically CONNECT with the other cabinets and become one tidy cabinet” There was also a video that showed up to four cabinets connecting in the natural expect...

Alex has decided it’s bygones. They checked for fit within this project, but “logic” simply didn’t indicate checking versus the predecessor project.

I too have found the old series cabinets have different polarity in the magnetic stacking than the new series. This is pretty disappointing, as the only way the new series connects with the old is if one series set has the drawers facing forwards while the other series set has its drawers facing bac...

Tuck C gets my vote, for the reasons expressed by the other C voter, followed closely by tuck A.

Ohhhh yeah! Can you do a gilded tier for these??

Can't believe I'm saying this but don't open it. I forgot about it completly but this deck is limited to a 1000 decks (there actually is a handnumber extra card on each deck, mine is number 401/1000). Curious. Does the extra numbered card have a text about the deck on its reverse, like this? toscan...

The printer has been announced now as USPCC. I am going for a pair on that news.

It is really too bad that this intricate, beautiful papercutting work translates to such a monotonous deck. I hoped to like this better. Not in.

(Prediction: The deck is sure to be available at ArtOfPlay at a slightly better cost eventually)

Just got my prototype deck in the mail today. I’ve gotta say... It’s pretty hard to take it out of the box. Not because I want to preserve the deck and keep it in pristine condition. I mean it’s really physically hard to take out the deck. I had to get a hold of a few cards, pull them out, and then...

A beautiful deck with this imagery, this thematic material, is possible. I’d back that deck. This just isn’t it.

As I piped up two weeks ago to say I hadn’t received anything, it’s only right I should say I have today gotten in my UC set, delivered as registered mail from Lotrek. Haven’t gotten past the stage of fondling the cello-wrapped loveliness yet, but I’m sure to succumb to temptation and open at least ...

Sorry to see this project be terminated, but extremely hopeful that it will see reincarnation and the ultimate success it merits. Good luck Sunish!

For clarity only: I’m not that guy (I don’t think?) I did drop the bundle tier, latish — only to upgrade to Room17 — and that bundle was grabbed up immediately by someone else (which I hoped would happen by my announcing it here). But also, yeah people sometimes just have to drop a pledge completely...

Just dropped my Gatekeeper bundle, so there is now one of those available again for the moment

I’d also like to see this fund — very much want to surprise my wife with this as an addition to her tarot collection (she hasn’t seen the major arcana deck, as I’ve been holding it back, sure that the full tarot will be complete at some point [fingers remain crossed)]. But I think the funding level ...

Sunish, I am very happy to be in and backing at the 2-deck tier. There is no doubt that the design here is great, the deck and tuck elements are superior in value/cost, and that your record on production quality is tops. But I do want to share, I hope constructively, some of what is holding me back ...